The evidence for anything Dershowitz seems to say is apparently never based upon more than general unsourced hearsay. He does not have much direct experience in New York trial courts because 1) he is not licensed as a lawyer in New York State and 2) his expertise is Appellate Practice, not trial practice. For example in the OJ case, he was hired for an eventual appeal and did no more than observe the trial along with several tens of millions of TV viewers. I presume his actual New York trial lawyer, Mr Aidala, has not been telling Dershowitz that New York courts are "corrupt". So what is his source?
Dershowitz' charges against the ICJ are not shared by Europeasn experts and are rather attributable to Dershowitz's intense hard core zionism which is of such a degree that it obfuscates all reason and fact. He is simply expressing the bias which permeates most of his podcasts.
Now, instead of listening to Dershowitz speculate for 20 minutes about hearsay which he will not source, be aware that Dershowitz has hands-ön experience with at least one particular and now famous legal process clearly connected to a substantial malfeasance of official duties according to a subsequent investigation by the Department of Justice in 2020. This regards not surprisingly the criminal investigation of Alan Dershowitz by the Palm Beach Police Department, subsequently taken over by the FBI over the filmed objections (still on the internet) of the police chief who feared political interference. This corruption related to charges of serial interstate nonconsensual child rape and against both Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz. The DOJ would subsequently excoriate Acosta. Acosta said he could not help it. He claimed intimidation and threats. Were they to his career, family, to himself, to someone else? We do not know. Acosta said he was told to "lay off" both Epstein and Dershowitz- because an "intelligence agency" was involved. Was Mossad or the CIA involved with Epstein/Dershowitz, pressuring Acosta on their behalf or did Epstein's defense team just make that up? Acosta gave Dershowitz - - -despite reams of allegations against him - - secret full immunity for any and all activities connected in some way to Epstein (in the form of a non-prosecution decision). Did Dershowitz do anything to deserve this full and secret immunity? Did he tell the FBI about what Clinton and Gates were doing in violation of statutory rape laws? Did he tell the CIA that Mossad was running the operation? Did he tell anything to deserve full immunity? Did he offer to testify against Epstein and Maxwell? Or do we not have here a real example of corruption in the legal process, one in which Dershowitz can tell us facts first hand?
And a further instance of corruption considered by DOJ is the extent of the cooperation between Epstein's defense team, including Dershowitz, and the federal prosecutors to keep victims from learning about the secret immunity agreement. Of course not single one of these allegations has ever reached a courtroom because of this pressure, intimidation of prosecutors, witnesses and victims, influence, money and some outside presence looming behind the scenes. Once when none of these worked and the case was going to a civil court hearing, the money seerms to be decisive. Right on the courthouse steps just before trial, Dershowitz arranged to pay off Virginia Giuffere with a SEVEN FIGURE hush money settlement (thru an insurance company!) Let's see, we were discussing corruption in the legal system.. ,weren't we...
The evidence for anything Dershowitz seems to say is apparently never based upon more than general unsourced hearsay. He does not have much direct experience in New York trial courts because 1) he is not licensed as a lawyer in New York State and 2) his expertise is Appellate Practice, not trial practice. For example in the OJ case, he was hired for an eventual appeal and did no more than observe the trial along with several tens of millions of TV viewers. I presume his actual New York trial lawyer, Mr Aidala, has not been telling Dershowitz that New York courts are "corrupt". So what is his source?
Dershowitz' charges against the ICJ are not shared by Europeasn experts and are rather attributable to Dershowitz's intense hard core zionism which is of such a degree that it obfuscates all reason and fact. He is simply expressing the bias which permeates most of his podcasts.
Now, instead of listening to Dershowitz speculate for 20 minutes about hearsay which he will not source, be aware that Dershowitz has hands-ön experience with at least one particular and now famous legal process clearly connected to a substantial malfeasance of official duties according to a subsequent investigation by the Department of Justice in 2020. This regards not surprisingly the criminal investigation of Alan Dershowitz by the Palm Beach Police Department, subsequently taken over by the FBI over the filmed objections (still on the internet) of the police chief who feared political interference. This corruption related to charges of serial interstate nonconsensual child rape and against both Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz. The DOJ would subsequently excoriate Acosta. Acosta said he could not help it. He claimed intimidation and threats. Were they to his career, family, to himself, to someone else? We do not know. Acosta said he was told to "lay off" both Epstein and Dershowitz- because an "intelligence agency" was involved. Was Mossad or the CIA involved with Epstein/Dershowitz, pressuring Acosta on their behalf or did Epstein's defense team just make that up? Acosta gave Dershowitz - - -despite reams of allegations against him - - secret full immunity for any and all activities connected in some way to Epstein (in the form of a non-prosecution decision). Did Dershowitz do anything to deserve this full and secret immunity? Did he tell the FBI about what Clinton and Gates were doing in violation of statutory rape laws? Did he tell the CIA that Mossad was running the operation? Did he tell anything to deserve full immunity? Did he offer to testify against Epstein and Maxwell? Or do we not have here a real example of corruption in the legal process, one in which Dershowitz can tell us facts first hand?
And a further instance of corruption considered by DOJ is the extent of the cooperation between Epstein's defense team, including Dershowitz, and the federal prosecutors to keep victims from learning about the secret immunity agreement. Of course not single one of these allegations has ever reached a courtroom because of this pressure, intimidation of prosecutors, witnesses and victims, influence, money and some outside presence looming behind the scenes. Once when none of these worked and the case was going to a civil court hearing, the money seerms to be decisive. Right on the courthouse steps just before trial, Dershowitz arranged to pay off Virginia Giuffere with a SEVEN FIGURE hush money settlement (thru an insurance company!) Let's see, we were discussing corruption in the legal system.. ,weren't we...
Always enlightening and important. Thank you! Yesher Koakh!