There are important reasons why credible allegations of pedophilic rape need to be tried in a court of law rather than covered up by money, political influence and intimidation. Conviction is the prerequisite for listing on a Sexual Offenders List. This coordinates with Megan's Law giving parents a protective tool for knowing where sexual offenders are. If a trial finds no guilt, then the allegations are forgettable. Absent trial, they are not. Arguably Dershowitz's prominent status in public forums as a "beyond the fringe" Zionist advocate and Genocide Denier displays a degree of ethnocentric obsession indicating Jewish children are not be at risk. But Epstein-related pedophilic rape allegations are exclusively related to Gentile children. Judicial examination of these allegations is important, especially because of Dershowitz's prominence. US DA Alex Acosta said he was intimidated from indicting Dershowitz. Dershowitz needs to call off the coverup. He NEVER has been exonerated, and he needs this. Acceptance of a million dollar payment by one accuser is not exoneration when she specifically said it was not. Dershowitz needs to make a trial possible to adjudicate the pedophilic rape allegations.
Vigilante justice seems relevant to Brian Thompson and people like Jeffrey Epstein.: America has problems with lawlessness, notably with some of the ultra-rich/influential being able to escape the consequences of serious law breaking. Brian Thompson needs no further description as a notorious robber baron completely unimpeded by law. We know the type and America, early on, has had precedent dealing with them. . Westerns are typically based on finding a way to stop people like Brian Thompson who has bought off, intimidated or influenced legal authorities. The fiction of Liberty Valence was based on fact. America has had a long tradition, particularly before 1890 of vigilante justice, where civilians are left to find justice when empowered legal authority is inactive. You still see some residual vigilante justice when juries determine guilt and basis for sentencing Dersh, a close associate of Jeffrey Epstein, has himself has been accused of committing some of the most serious (and serial) crimes against children short of killing and mutilating. He has STILL not been been indicted. We know why. DA Alex Acosta admitted to weakness; he said he was intimidated, pressured beyond his capacity to resist. He was also told an intelligence agency was involved "so lay off". Dersh will be at an elite dinner tonite, perhaps the center of attention as he explains why an accused genocidal war criminal should be allowed to speak with impunity in Poland, why Poles in a conquered country were complicit in the Holocaust and not a single word tonite will be uttered about those children sexually enslaved by Epstein.,
We need a serious discussion about the future of American legal institutions in view of its current occasional yet often predictable inability to enforce law and retribution for the serious crimes of some of the elite. Perhaps vigilante justice in some form and to some extent should be legitimately recognized when political/ideological corruption of the legal system makes impossible the search for justice.
There are important reasons why credible allegations of pedophilic rape need to be tried in a court of law rather than covered up by money, political influence and intimidation. Conviction is the prerequisite for listing on a Sexual Offenders List. This coordinates with Megan's Law giving parents a protective tool for knowing where sexual offenders are. If a trial finds no guilt, then the allegations are forgettable. Absent trial, they are not. Arguably Dershowitz's prominent status in public forums as a "beyond the fringe" Zionist advocate and Genocide Denier displays a degree of ethnocentric obsession indicating Jewish children are not be at risk. But Epstein-related pedophilic rape allegations are exclusively related to Gentile children. Judicial examination of these allegations is important, especially because of Dershowitz's prominence. US DA Alex Acosta said he was intimidated from indicting Dershowitz. Dershowitz needs to call off the coverup. He NEVER has been exonerated, and he needs this. Acceptance of a million dollar payment by one accuser is not exoneration when she specifically said it was not. Dershowitz needs to make a trial possible to adjudicate the pedophilic rape allegations.
Vigilante justice seems relevant to Brian Thompson and people like Jeffrey Epstein.: America has problems with lawlessness, notably with some of the ultra-rich/influential being able to escape the consequences of serious law breaking. Brian Thompson needs no further description as a notorious robber baron completely unimpeded by law. We know the type and America, early on, has had precedent dealing with them. . Westerns are typically based on finding a way to stop people like Brian Thompson who has bought off, intimidated or influenced legal authorities. The fiction of Liberty Valence was based on fact. America has had a long tradition, particularly before 1890 of vigilante justice, where civilians are left to find justice when empowered legal authority is inactive. You still see some residual vigilante justice when juries determine guilt and basis for sentencing Dersh, a close associate of Jeffrey Epstein, has himself has been accused of committing some of the most serious (and serial) crimes against children short of killing and mutilating. He has STILL not been been indicted. We know why. DA Alex Acosta admitted to weakness; he said he was intimidated, pressured beyond his capacity to resist. He was also told an intelligence agency was involved "so lay off". Dersh will be at an elite dinner tonite, perhaps the center of attention as he explains why an accused genocidal war criminal should be allowed to speak with impunity in Poland, why Poles in a conquered country were complicit in the Holocaust and not a single word tonite will be uttered about those children sexually enslaved by Epstein.,
We need a serious discussion about the future of American legal institutions in view of its current occasional yet often predictable inability to enforce law and retribution for the serious crimes of some of the elite. Perhaps vigilante justice in some form and to some extent should be legitimately recognized when political/ideological corruption of the legal system makes impossible the search for justice.