The DEI crowd reminds me of Churchill’s comment about Islam when he noted that when Muslims are in the minority they scream for equal rights, but when Muslims are in the majority there ARE NO EQUAL rights.
I love professor Dershowitz! He’s so real. Tells you exactly what’s going on and explains both sides to issues so you can think it out. Happy Passover!
Harvard has already lost big time with the American masses. As a double Ivy League graduate I am done with the whole thing. The phony elitism is repellent. I wish Trump would shut up about his Wharton degree too. That doesn’t mean anything either.
After the campus takeovers and obvious antisemitism at the Congressional Hearings where calling for the genocide of Jews was deemed to be a matter of context, Harvard convened a
committee to make recommendations to it to deal with Harvard antisemitism. The committee, including prominent National and Los Angeles, Rabbi Volpe who was serving as a visiting professor at Harvard, identified numerous steps that Harvard could take to protect Jewish students at Harvard. Harvard rejected everyone of the committee’s proposals.
No question, Harvard can't win this, to many statute violations. They have every right to kick Federal $ to the curb, and stay the course. Hard to believe Harvard was started by devout Christians ousted from European countries and England.
You always explain the law so that a lay person can follow your reasoned arguments, I followed you on Just the News and have grown to trust in your principles, depth of knowledge, and logic. Why others have a problem with ideas is beyond me. If one teaches at an Ivy League surely one can hear an idea they do not like. Many times, a good argument, even if not changing one's mind enhances one's understanding, William Raspberry was great at that. If one has children, one should definitely be able to consider ideas one does not like. Thank you, Mr. Dershowitz,
Good show. I think a lot of these so called 30 year old false accusations of "rape" cases, many with zero evidence, against famous wealthy men have just become a standard business formula to get a cash pay-off. Lawyers representing these cases are no different, just after a quick buck. It's another money making scheme. I agree with your discussion about Harvard. Luckily I graduated from University with multiple degrees many decades ago, and I don't remember any racism and I doubt DEI existed, at least as far as I know. There was sexist however, but that was everywhere. I just have pleasant memories hunting for my research deep in the bowels of ancient libraries....lol. Thank you.
Businessmen Presidents are so much wiser than crooked lawyers from Harvard, like the Clintons the Obamas and the Biden Mafia. If only Justice wasn't a blind woman.
The title issue was eclipsed in the beginning with old legal cases involving what essentially are dirtballs; nothing to do with Harvard till way into the video. When I click on a subject, I expect it to be more front and center. Few care about Harvey W and OJ.
It is Dershowitz who is the podcaster. Dirtballs are his natural company. Mark Shapiro, Sholom Rubaskin, the JDL killer, George Nader, Jeffrey Epstein, Jonthan Braun, Robert Manning, Ghislaine Maxwell, the worst of the worst for whom Dershowitz peddles influence to get released to commit more crime on decent people. Thanks to Dershowitz, Epstein had ten years protection from law enforcement before his first arrest during which he and his organization accounted for raping 250 American children, mostly underage. Then Epstein turned them over to other pedos who were filmed and blackmailed. After Epstein's first arrest, Dershowitz peddled influence and gave Epstein another ten years of joy of sex with the underaged. And do not forget Dersh himself, the court-determined wife batterer, was also specifically accused of child rape by a number of children.Then Dersh peddled influence to arrange a cover up followed up by a secret non-prosecution agreement covering of all his Epstein era activity including the alleged pedo crime, No criminal court was allowed to judge the veracity of the childrens' allegations of Dershowitz's rapes. He was not going to take any chances with a criminal trial. And that influence bought a lot of cooperation in the form of stopping the Palm Beach Police pedo investigation and switching the case over to the FBI which sealed everything But the stain of unrebutted pedo accusation arose again in 2017 when the Federal DA Acosta who granted the non-prosecution agreement was forced to resign from his plum reward as Secretary of Labor after the Miami Herald published details of the secret Dershowitz immunity agreement. Acosta's career in public life ended. But Dershowitz's continued. And that cover up has still not been pierced. But Dersh is still on the loose, still on the prowl on talk shows. and at the tables of the rich and famous, and Netanyahu's too. Dersh probably can not catch the young kids walking to school. But like the other day, women like Ms Fleming commenting on his podcast still want him to invite her to dinner. And so does this dentist in Florida.. They are probably safe; after all they are not underage.
Prove the assertion of your first clause, Mr Redstone. Or at least try to. Let''s read your research and see how much you cognitate before writing the word "bulls. What can you cite as research and fact- based conclusions - - - as far as is possible given the comprehensive cover up of every matter related to 1) the activities of the Epstein pedo Grooming Gang and 2) the man you are "not a big fan of"
If your premise is that he cannot have been a pedo, wife batterer, unregistered foreign agent, Epstein protector and enabler, et cetera, because he is 1) hard core zionist 2) Orthodox Jewish (which forbids pedophilia activity) 3) sits at the table with Netanyahu 4)) a Harvard professor, 5) appeared on Megyn Kelly and Piers Morgan, just write this. Alternatively, maybe you can seek for yourself and your ideology, a role model who is less (let's be very diplomatic here= "less controversial" with much, much less connection to people who ruined underage children.
The DEI crowd reminds me of Churchill’s comment about Islam when he noted that when Muslims are in the minority they scream for equal rights, but when Muslims are in the majority there ARE NO EQUAL rights.
I love professor Dershowitz! He’s so real. Tells you exactly what’s going on and explains both sides to issues so you can think it out. Happy Passover!
Harvard has already lost big time with the American masses. As a double Ivy League graduate I am done with the whole thing. The phony elitism is repellent. I wish Trump would shut up about his Wharton degree too. That doesn’t mean anything either.
After the campus takeovers and obvious antisemitism at the Congressional Hearings where calling for the genocide of Jews was deemed to be a matter of context, Harvard convened a
committee to make recommendations to it to deal with Harvard antisemitism. The committee, including prominent National and Los Angeles, Rabbi Volpe who was serving as a visiting professor at Harvard, identified numerous steps that Harvard could take to protect Jewish students at Harvard. Harvard rejected everyone of the committee’s proposals.
ALAN
REMEMBERS…
WHEN HE WAS YOUNG
Or do you have it garbled: Alan
Remembers
When he was copulating the Young
Not so long ago
No question, Harvard can't win this, to many statute violations. They have every right to kick Federal $ to the curb, and stay the course. Hard to believe Harvard was started by devout Christians ousted from European countries and England.
You always explain the law so that a lay person can follow your reasoned arguments, I followed you on Just the News and have grown to trust in your principles, depth of knowledge, and logic. Why others have a problem with ideas is beyond me. If one teaches at an Ivy League surely one can hear an idea they do not like. Many times, a good argument, even if not changing one's mind enhances one's understanding, William Raspberry was great at that. If one has children, one should definitely be able to consider ideas one does not like. Thank you, Mr. Dershowitz,
Good show. I think a lot of these so called 30 year old false accusations of "rape" cases, many with zero evidence, against famous wealthy men have just become a standard business formula to get a cash pay-off. Lawyers representing these cases are no different, just after a quick buck. It's another money making scheme. I agree with your discussion about Harvard. Luckily I graduated from University with multiple degrees many decades ago, and I don't remember any racism and I doubt DEI existed, at least as far as I know. There was sexist however, but that was everywhere. I just have pleasant memories hunting for my research deep in the bowels of ancient libraries....lol. Thank you.
Good for you, completely able to conclude without ever examining the evidence. Tabula Rusa. Michel
Hopefully Harvard
Professor, doesn’t Harvard have enough $ without federal assistance? Hillsdale College does not accept a dime of federal money.
Businessmen Presidents are so much wiser than crooked lawyers from Harvard, like the Clintons the Obamas and the Biden Mafia. If only Justice wasn't a blind woman.
HELLO ALAN…
SO YOU GONNA KILL YER SELF
OR…
When you wish upon a star.... As was said in the sixties, "Progress comes one funeral at a time",
The title issue was eclipsed in the beginning with old legal cases involving what essentially are dirtballs; nothing to do with Harvard till way into the video. When I click on a subject, I expect it to be more front and center. Few care about Harvey W and OJ.
It is Dershowitz who is the podcaster. Dirtballs are his natural company. Mark Shapiro, Sholom Rubaskin, the JDL killer, George Nader, Jeffrey Epstein, Jonthan Braun, Robert Manning, Ghislaine Maxwell, the worst of the worst for whom Dershowitz peddles influence to get released to commit more crime on decent people. Thanks to Dershowitz, Epstein had ten years protection from law enforcement before his first arrest during which he and his organization accounted for raping 250 American children, mostly underage. Then Epstein turned them over to other pedos who were filmed and blackmailed. After Epstein's first arrest, Dershowitz peddled influence and gave Epstein another ten years of joy of sex with the underaged. And do not forget Dersh himself, the court-determined wife batterer, was also specifically accused of child rape by a number of children.Then Dersh peddled influence to arrange a cover up followed up by a secret non-prosecution agreement covering of all his Epstein era activity including the alleged pedo crime, No criminal court was allowed to judge the veracity of the childrens' allegations of Dershowitz's rapes. He was not going to take any chances with a criminal trial. And that influence bought a lot of cooperation in the form of stopping the Palm Beach Police pedo investigation and switching the case over to the FBI which sealed everything But the stain of unrebutted pedo accusation arose again in 2017 when the Federal DA Acosta who granted the non-prosecution agreement was forced to resign from his plum reward as Secretary of Labor after the Miami Herald published details of the secret Dershowitz immunity agreement. Acosta's career in public life ended. But Dershowitz's continued. And that cover up has still not been pierced. But Dersh is still on the loose, still on the prowl on talk shows. and at the tables of the rich and famous, and Netanyahu's too. Dersh probably can not catch the young kids walking to school. But like the other day, women like Ms Fleming commenting on his podcast still want him to invite her to dinner. And so does this dentist in Florida.. They are probably safe; after all they are not underage.
Lots of bullshit there.. and I’m not a big fan of Dershowitz
Prove the assertion of your first clause, Mr Redstone. Or at least try to. Let''s read your research and see how much you cognitate before writing the word "bulls. What can you cite as research and fact- based conclusions - - - as far as is possible given the comprehensive cover up of every matter related to 1) the activities of the Epstein pedo Grooming Gang and 2) the man you are "not a big fan of"
If your premise is that he cannot have been a pedo, wife batterer, unregistered foreign agent, Epstein protector and enabler, et cetera, because he is 1) hard core zionist 2) Orthodox Jewish (which forbids pedophilia activity) 3) sits at the table with Netanyahu 4)) a Harvard professor, 5) appeared on Megyn Kelly and Piers Morgan, just write this. Alternatively, maybe you can seek for yourself and your ideology, a role model who is less (let's be very diplomatic here= "less controversial" with much, much less connection to people who ruined underage children.