Trump won. Kamala didn’t answer questions. The biased media tried to “fact check” Trump but lied. They misinformed numbers from crime “statistics” and were misinformed about late-term abortion in WI and earlier in VA. First question was never answered by her. She pivoted by talking about her younger life (who cares?). She brought up Project 2024 which Trump has said many times is not his agenda. Yet they allowed the question. Too many questions unanswered
These American mutations of classical debate require a fairly high quality knowledge.for the media moderators. But the chosen moderators (Megyn Kelley excepted) never match that threshold. Is it not time to go back to simple classic debates, Lincoln-Douglas style, like the High School Debate Team, ten or twenty minutes to present, 5 to rebutt and 5 to summarize. No journalists anywhere near the stage. Let them stay, queued up at the local AIPAC office awaiting their handouts.l.
Trump won on substance, Harris on style. She masterfully dodged questions, aided by two hosts who made at least two incorrect "fact checks," but also seemd to me to act like a juvenile with her smiling at Trump's responses. But then again, I have never respected her jugment or political acumen. In a popularity contest, she wom the debate by a mile. On a confidence vote, she lost by the same margin. I cannot imagine her handling adversaral foreign policy issues with Xi or Putin, much less being a commander-in-chief responsible for nuclear codes.
For the last four years, what have Harris-Biden & Co. done to prevent another 9/11? They have allowed and encouraged millions of illegal aliens to infiltrate the United States, including terrorists.
Dershowitz has at least since the seventies been characterized by his emphasis on ad hominum attacks rather than primarily intellectual consideration of issues. This became dramatic when he publically attacked his fellow Jew Professor Finkelstein and his Holocaust Survival family with the baseless claim that Finkelstin's mother was a capo. Dershowitz then proceeeded to influence AIPAC donors to join him in pushing De Paul University to annul Finkelstein's tenure and fire him. The pressure of Jewish donors on the university presaged today's situation. The University administation caved in and fired Finkelstein. While his use of ad hominum attacks has achieved generally the goals Dershowitz wants, he is personally extremely vulnerable himself to .truthful ad hominum attacks as well as graphic accounts of his sexual attacks on young statutorily protected teenagers though celebrity money and avowedly Zionist network of comrades has allowed him to so far avoid criminal indictment and even civil trial. Dershowitz uses that money and those comrades to try to maintain a kernel of doubt as to the documented Epstein -Dershwitz accusations. See New Yorker, July 25, 2019 for more detail.
His close intimate involvement with and endorsements of Jeffrey Epstein is an unredeemable sin. Jeffrey was the sophisticated, socially intelligent, very much physicaly in demand former Mideast arms dealer who arrived back in New York to weld rich Jews into a formidable unified political and social influence, not for communism or civil rights, but for the interests of israel. Dershowitz was interesting to Epstein because nerdy Alan was a trophy proving the intellectual acceptability of Epstein's movement. Epstein and Dershowitz became very close. Vanity Fair in 2003 dedicated a five page article to the bromance, chronicalling the two, walking for hours, sometimes arm in arm on the Coney Island boardwalk. The lobbying ideas eventually turned to information acquisition and influencing, and then to blackmail. Dershowitz and Epstein had a number of goals, including issues very near to the heart of the Israeli political establishment, such as getting the release of Israeli Pentagon superspy Jonathan Pollard who had provided Mossad with an extraordinary volume of US military secrets, giving Mossad both more information on Arab neighbors and both codes and information which were sold surprisingly to the USSR.. The influencing lobby eventually turned into something more effective: blackmail. Honey traps are well known in influence operations. But this blackmail was far more effective Targets were blackmailed because they had fallen for the temptation of sexual penetration with underage (all Gentile, the formal zionism prevented defilement of underage Jews) children. This happened at locations on Pedophile Island, The NYC Epstein mansion at 11 E 71st Street, and in his Palm Beach mansion. and Deeshowitz not only professionally protected from law enforcement and enabled the Epstein blackmail operation, he was graphically accused by underage children of raping them, in dealer parlance, "sampling the wares". Of course, Dershowitz never stopped the Epstein operation by informing police of the child sex slaves and how thehy were used. And Dershowitz has apparently never cooperated since by identifying the blackmail victims, what they specifically did, what he heard, what he saw on videos in the mansions, and all the co-conspirators of Epstein. And any co-conspirators connected to Dershowitz.
Dershowitz is a Jewish bigot and openly an unregistered foreign agent for Israel. His devotion to Israel is primary. One wonders if Substack might have liability for hosting Dershow.
WHAT DID SHE SAY? NOTHING. LOTS OF WORD SALAD, LIES AND FLIP FLOPS. NOTHING THERE. NOTHING. HE WON BIG. SHE CAME ON AS A NOTHING THERE, NOTHING BUT A BARKING CHIWAWA.
100 replies to a spelling error. Hmmm, I wonder what your inbox must look when something important comes along. The "debate" certainly isn't among them.
I agree 100% with today's discussion, no problem. I watched the debate...at times I was yelling at the TV telling Trump to stick to the topic and attack only salient points....lol...I couldn't believe what I saw, he took every bait tossed at him. Hubris was my first thought, he's should watch himself perform and cringe so he can get better, but I doubt his ego would let him. He did have a strong finish line however, and a few very good points, here and there, but too far apart. Way too much ranting about the same old topics. However, the moderators where incredibly biased, fact checked every point Trump made, follow up questions to lead and goad Trump astray, etc. Where were the fact checks on Harris? Non existent. She got away telling some of the biggest whoppers of the evening, without any fact check. This is the longest I have ever watched Harris in action and I did not like this woman. Lots of artificial posturing, weak sniveling and whimpering about women's rights and the plight of poor people (from her privileged elitist social class position), then attacking Trump with the same old Biden debunked talking points, a mini-me Biden 2.0, complete with "I'll be a president for all Americans, of either party". She dodged every important question and went on long off topic tangents. Harris further ridiculed Trump; mocking him; laughing at him sarcastically....she contrasted Trump as the "past" and she was the "future", an attack on his age. Harris gave me the creeps and made my skin crawl. I would not and could not stand being in the same room with this woman, no matter which party she belonged to, I would just walk out. I never realised how completely unlikeable she is, I guess that's why she has such a high staff turn over.....lol.
WHAT DID SHE SAY? NOTHING. LOTS OF WORD SALAD, LIES AND FLIP FLOPS. NOTHING THERE. NOTHING. HE WON BIG. SHE CAME ON AS A NOTHING THERE, NOTHING BUT A BARKING CHIWAWA.
Did we watch the same debate ? I support Trump however he failed to use the platform to his advantage. He didn’t battle plan it and I doubt if he rehearsed potential questions
Already we see allegations of Harris having early access to the questions. Maybe so but blind Freddy could have worked out the majority of the questions
Summary
“Pretend to be weak, so your enemy may grow arrogant “ Tsun Zsu
Yes, he of course did badly. But it was three to one. He failed to present what he will do, and constantly got sidetracked on irrelevancies. He let Kamala determine the debate discourse,, since she habitually avoided answering questions and moved onto a preprepared topic. I wonder if her name is in Epstein's Black Book. Ask Dershowitz. Maybe she and Dershowitz have had some activities in common, maybe Willie Brown, maybe Jeffrey,maybe someone subordinate to Jeffrey... didn't she take money from AIPAC and the free guided tour of Israel?.
For geniuses like professor Dershowitz it’s not necessarily to spell correctly. What a nonsense to write 100 letters on that subject! His talents do not lie in grammar. Btw Einstein was a terrible at school, want to criticize him for spelling?
How about his talent for truthtelling? How about his talent for presenting both sides of an issue, as a lawyer is expected to study? How about his talent for respecting the law, including laws governing statutory rape.? How about his talent for empathy with people from a different tribe, and for that matter with gentiles? How about his talent for influencing with career advice and intimidating a prosecutor with authority to indict for sex crimes? Talent is generally connectedto good thingsand purposes. Not with Dershowitz.
And WHO anoited Dershowitz "genius"! Somebody is myth making. Name me a genius who is a mere foreign agent propagandist
Trump won. Kamala didn’t answer questions. The biased media tried to “fact check” Trump but lied. They misinformed numbers from crime “statistics” and were misinformed about late-term abortion in WI and earlier in VA. First question was never answered by her. She pivoted by talking about her younger life (who cares?). She brought up Project 2024 which Trump has said many times is not his agenda. Yet they allowed the question. Too many questions unanswered
These American mutations of classical debate require a fairly high quality knowledge.for the media moderators. But the chosen moderators (Megyn Kelley excepted) never match that threshold. Is it not time to go back to simple classic debates, Lincoln-Douglas style, like the High School Debate Team, ten or twenty minutes to present, 5 to rebutt and 5 to summarize. No journalists anywhere near the stage. Let them stay, queued up at the local AIPAC office awaiting their handouts.l.
Trump won on substance, Harris on style. She masterfully dodged questions, aided by two hosts who made at least two incorrect "fact checks," but also seemd to me to act like a juvenile with her smiling at Trump's responses. But then again, I have never respected her jugment or political acumen. In a popularity contest, she wom the debate by a mile. On a confidence vote, she lost by the same margin. I cannot imagine her handling adversaral foreign policy issues with Xi or Putin, much less being a commander-in-chief responsible for nuclear codes.
For the last four years, what have Harris-Biden & Co. done to prevent another 9/11? They have allowed and encouraged millions of illegal aliens to infiltrate the United States, including terrorists.
Dershowitz has at least since the seventies been characterized by his emphasis on ad hominum attacks rather than primarily intellectual consideration of issues. This became dramatic when he publically attacked his fellow Jew Professor Finkelstein and his Holocaust Survival family with the baseless claim that Finkelstin's mother was a capo. Dershowitz then proceeeded to influence AIPAC donors to join him in pushing De Paul University to annul Finkelstein's tenure and fire him. The pressure of Jewish donors on the university presaged today's situation. The University administation caved in and fired Finkelstein. While his use of ad hominum attacks has achieved generally the goals Dershowitz wants, he is personally extremely vulnerable himself to .truthful ad hominum attacks as well as graphic accounts of his sexual attacks on young statutorily protected teenagers though celebrity money and avowedly Zionist network of comrades has allowed him to so far avoid criminal indictment and even civil trial. Dershowitz uses that money and those comrades to try to maintain a kernel of doubt as to the documented Epstein -Dershwitz accusations. See New Yorker, July 25, 2019 for more detail.
His close intimate involvement with and endorsements of Jeffrey Epstein is an unredeemable sin. Jeffrey was the sophisticated, socially intelligent, very much physicaly in demand former Mideast arms dealer who arrived back in New York to weld rich Jews into a formidable unified political and social influence, not for communism or civil rights, but for the interests of israel. Dershowitz was interesting to Epstein because nerdy Alan was a trophy proving the intellectual acceptability of Epstein's movement. Epstein and Dershowitz became very close. Vanity Fair in 2003 dedicated a five page article to the bromance, chronicalling the two, walking for hours, sometimes arm in arm on the Coney Island boardwalk. The lobbying ideas eventually turned to information acquisition and influencing, and then to blackmail. Dershowitz and Epstein had a number of goals, including issues very near to the heart of the Israeli political establishment, such as getting the release of Israeli Pentagon superspy Jonathan Pollard who had provided Mossad with an extraordinary volume of US military secrets, giving Mossad both more information on Arab neighbors and both codes and information which were sold surprisingly to the USSR.. The influencing lobby eventually turned into something more effective: blackmail. Honey traps are well known in influence operations. But this blackmail was far more effective Targets were blackmailed because they had fallen for the temptation of sexual penetration with underage (all Gentile, the formal zionism prevented defilement of underage Jews) children. This happened at locations on Pedophile Island, The NYC Epstein mansion at 11 E 71st Street, and in his Palm Beach mansion. and Deeshowitz not only professionally protected from law enforcement and enabled the Epstein blackmail operation, he was graphically accused by underage children of raping them, in dealer parlance, "sampling the wares". Of course, Dershowitz never stopped the Epstein operation by informing police of the child sex slaves and how thehy were used. And Dershowitz has apparently never cooperated since by identifying the blackmail victims, what they specifically did, what he heard, what he saw on videos in the mansions, and all the co-conspirators of Epstein. And any co-conspirators connected to Dershowitz.
Dershowitz is a Jewish bigot and openly an unregistered foreign agent for Israel. His devotion to Israel is primary. One wonders if Substack might have liability for hosting Dershow.
WHAT DID SHE SAY? NOTHING. LOTS OF WORD SALAD, LIES AND FLIP FLOPS. NOTHING THERE. NOTHING. HE WON BIG. SHE CAME ON AS A NOTHING THERE, NOTHING BUT A BARKING CHIWAWA.
Ilhan Omar saying “Some people did something” referring to the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
100 replies to a spelling error. Hmmm, I wonder what your inbox must look when something important comes along. The "debate" certainly isn't among them.
I agree 100% with today's discussion, no problem. I watched the debate...at times I was yelling at the TV telling Trump to stick to the topic and attack only salient points....lol...I couldn't believe what I saw, he took every bait tossed at him. Hubris was my first thought, he's should watch himself perform and cringe so he can get better, but I doubt his ego would let him. He did have a strong finish line however, and a few very good points, here and there, but too far apart. Way too much ranting about the same old topics. However, the moderators where incredibly biased, fact checked every point Trump made, follow up questions to lead and goad Trump astray, etc. Where were the fact checks on Harris? Non existent. She got away telling some of the biggest whoppers of the evening, without any fact check. This is the longest I have ever watched Harris in action and I did not like this woman. Lots of artificial posturing, weak sniveling and whimpering about women's rights and the plight of poor people (from her privileged elitist social class position), then attacking Trump with the same old Biden debunked talking points, a mini-me Biden 2.0, complete with "I'll be a president for all Americans, of either party". She dodged every important question and went on long off topic tangents. Harris further ridiculed Trump; mocking him; laughing at him sarcastically....she contrasted Trump as the "past" and she was the "future", an attack on his age. Harris gave me the creeps and made my skin crawl. I would not and could not stand being in the same room with this woman, no matter which party she belonged to, I would just walk out. I never realised how completely unlikeable she is, I guess that's why she has such a high staff turn over.....lol.
WHAT DID SHE SAY? NOTHING. LOTS OF WORD SALAD, LIES AND FLIP FLOPS. NOTHING THERE. NOTHING. HE WON BIG. SHE CAME ON AS A NOTHING THERE, NOTHING BUT A BARKING CHIWAWA.
Have you noticd thatin almost every single comment, Michel "agrees 100%" seems to be his intellectual leitmotif.. Guess he is a good follower.
Did we watch the same debate ? I support Trump however he failed to use the platform to his advantage. He didn’t battle plan it and I doubt if he rehearsed potential questions
Already we see allegations of Harris having early access to the questions. Maybe so but blind Freddy could have worked out the majority of the questions
Summary
“Pretend to be weak, so your enemy may grow arrogant “ Tsun Zsu
Yes, he of course did badly. But it was three to one. He failed to present what he will do, and constantly got sidetracked on irrelevancies. He let Kamala determine the debate discourse,, since she habitually avoided answering questions and moved onto a preprepared topic. I wonder if her name is in Epstein's Black Book. Ask Dershowitz. Maybe she and Dershowitz have had some activities in common, maybe Willie Brown, maybe Jeffrey,maybe someone subordinate to Jeffrey... didn't she take money from AIPAC and the free guided tour of Israel?.
Excellent reply, Greg. She fit the template for a boat girl
Thanks, but the mystery is what "BOAT GIRL" is
For geniuses like professor Dershowitz it’s not necessarily to spell correctly. What a nonsense to write 100 letters on that subject! His talents do not lie in grammar. Btw Einstein was a terrible at school, want to criticize him for spelling?
How about his talent for truthtelling? How about his talent for presenting both sides of an issue, as a lawyer is expected to study? How about his talent for respecting the law, including laws governing statutory rape.? How about his talent for empathy with people from a different tribe, and for that matter with gentiles? How about his talent for influencing with career advice and intimidating a prosecutor with authority to indict for sex crimes? Talent is generally connectedto good thingsand purposes. Not with Dershowitz.
And WHO anoited Dershowitz "genius"! Somebody is myth making. Name me a genius who is a mere foreign agent propagandist