Wow Professor. I quote “… overruling Roe would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. ” does that speak to the events of January 6 as well? “ … (upholding a questionable result ) would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. “ or can you “distinguish” as …
Wow Professor. I quote “… overruling Roe would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. ” does that speak to the events of January 6 as well? “ … (upholding a questionable result ) would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. “ or can you “distinguish” as a legal scholar? Or “distinguish” on the basis of partisan argument; an advocate as it were?
Wow Professor. I quote “… overruling Roe would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. ” does that speak to the events of January 6 as well? “ … (upholding a questionable result ) would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. “ or can you “distinguish” as a legal scholar? Or “distinguish” on the basis of partisan argument; an advocate as it were?