It's quite obvious based on the alien invasion act that what we should question is how a judge could be so corrupt as to think he had any jurisdiction in the matters of the executive branch in the first place. Clearly, that judge's position is what should be in question, this is a matter of ego infecting justice.
You ASKED @ 17:45 mark of the video of any listeners could tell you why the administration used this 1798 act - TWO WORDS!!!
CASE LAW:
Specifically--Ludecke v. Watkins (1948)
Please Read the case majority, the administration is using it because it has decided case law that judiciary has no say no preview or jurisdiction in this 1798 act, and that the law essentially is free of due process.
The Diaz case was not being tested under the 1798 act it was about benefits and immigration status etc, no one in the Diaz case was being removed because of the alien eniemes act of 1798, the reason I believe the administration chose this act was because of the case law, when invoked, the executive has full discretion, and judiciary has no perview, per the case law 1948 wadkins case.
Seriously Sir. Do you still have TDS…..he does not do anything that would cause him to be on the wrong side of the law…you need to get over your TDS…..and he has terrific staff, maybe even better than you….though you are pretty good…except you get criminals off…..
Allegations specifying Dershowitz's extreme and serial pedophilic sexual deviancy with non-consenting underage children have STILL not been tried in any court. He still gets to visit his grandson and be present near a kindergarden or elementary school without being registered as a sexual offender. Similarly NONE of the scores of pedophilic predators have been indicted despite offenses committed in connection to the Epstein Grooming Gang and to a Mossad blackmail scheme using slightly post-puberty kids as honey bait.. Because they and Dershowitz have the world's best protectors.
Some may have been extrajudicially punished. Dr Henry Jarekie has been sued in New York Civil Court. Prince Andrew, like Dershowitz, had the very same child victim who was paid hush mney to drop her civil cases against both. . Allegations of Bill Gates involvement apparently led to dissolution of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. But the predators are STILL protected from Law Enforcement. Today is DAY 2440 of the Epstein Dershowitz cover-up. This is why no jury or judge gets to adjudicate the widespread allegations of pedophilia. Allegations against Dershowitz describe an extremely evil man. The explicit content and serial nature of the pedo allegations should put Manhattan Child Services on notice to restrict Dershowitz' visits with his grandson at least to the extent requiring a competent chaperone be present. Pedos are notorious recidivists. Child Services failed the children groomed in the Epstein Organization and it is doing nothing to protect Dershowitz's grandson.. It appears Dershowitz's hard core zionism led him to a desire to be useful to the cause, become best friends with the Agent Epstein, help him with finances and contacts and then protect him from Law Enforcement. And then came the underage childrens' complaints of brutal and drugged-into-compliance rape.. But Dersh has the world's best protection, as long a he does not squeal.
Frank: you advertise your lack of knowledge on the subject.of allegations of Dershowitz's pedophilia. He could perhaps have won a trial with his ad hominem attacks on the groomed underage children. He called the 14 year olds "prostitutes, liars and thieves", white trailer park trash. It is incredible in America where the social instinct is to protect the vulnerable, especially the young children, that Dershowitz gets away with behaviour that the children underscored was pedophilic rape. Nothing dubious about this at all, Frank. Your fandom is exactly the distraction Dersh wants.Pedophilia is even against Jewish Law. Dersh did everything possible to avoid a trial because he did not want to be found guilty of pedo rape and child.traffickoing. He would have had to live in jail. .Is it better that the law was not enforced, that he avoided a trial by jury? Frank, you are literate but you know nothing of what Dersh did for Epstein? You never read the allegations? You do not know how Dersh got a full immunity for all pedo activity. You never learned about the Epstein-Dershowitz prdo cover-up? Frank!
There is pressure to release the covered up FBI files, including the criminal pedo investigation of Dersh and also including the interviews of Palm Beach Po,lice with 33 underage girls of the roughly 250 girls passing thru the Epstein pedo organization. Secretary Bondi has promised full release, but she is a newbie and may easily be stymied by the people supporting Dersh. Dersh no ,longer has that secret full immunity. It was revoked. Dersh did not know it violated the Federal Victims Rights Law. So much for the legal knowledge of a Harvard Emeritus. When news of the immunity and the sweetheart deal for Epstein leaked, Federal DA Acosta who had been improperly influenced, was forced to resign from his newly acquired job as Secretary of Labor. Frank, you write comments. why do you not research the background of the person you listen to and clearly admire? I am told that some people enjoy researching what Dersh allegedly did because it saves them the fees that the Dark Web and Pornhub charges. I and surely you are not one of these, but educated people should take time and effort to know about whatever Dersh did while intimately associated with Agent Epstein. And it is not too late for a trial, Secretary Bondi. There is no statute of limitation in New York or Florida on pedo rape. Anyone else would have been tried on thee allegations from so many children. Dersh may still receive justice.
BTW, as to Dersh there is no subject other than his alleged pedophilic rapes.and his ruination of the lives of what he deemed were trailer park trash.
Again, dubious comments, and off subject. Not saying your comments are not true, but find another podcast, etc., more fitting with your concerns. You are dangerously close to following liberals into a lawless landscape where nothing but rage rules. That's you!
Occasionally a man seems so egregiously immoral and yet protected from legal punishment that he needs to be directly confronted with the consequences of his immorality. You know, America is still a free country at least until the Senate enacts the IHRC definition of "antisemitism" into law. Frank, if you cannot be persuaded by what I write, just skip my comments, No skin off my teeth. I actually do not expect for example hard core Zionist to show empathy for victims of the Epstein Organization's almost industrial rapes of, according to AG Pam Bondi, 250 children who were mostly underage and all Gentile.
Furthermore my comments go to Dersh's judgement and credibility. If you had an open enough mind to be persuaded that Dershowitz had likely raped numerous groomed kids in a brutal fashion, despite his status in the Orthodox community groomed children, then you would probably apply your word of choice "dubious" to Dershowitz rather than hi investigators. Are you so biased you are not in the least interested in why Derhowitz did not want a trial and why a million dollars in huh money was paid? But you do not have to be skeptical about Dersh. Just read what you like.
I cannot spend more time with you. I am running down a rumor about deaths of a couple of the girls under grooming. If true,, then maybe some explicit or implicit confirmation can be found despite the comprehensive cover-up. Mr Dershowitz may of course choose to confirm this rumor if he, as Epstein's attirney, knows it is true. But he never would. Omerta.
The help is being sought in the form of prosecutors indicting Dershowitz for pedophilic rape. Note Abolitionists in 1859 were accused of "frothing at the mouth". when they demanded slavery's prohibition. in the face of resistance by a Deep State, "frothing" may be a natural reaction on the way to achieving justice and ending immorality.
It's quite obvious based on the alien invasion act that what we should question is how a judge could be so corrupt as to think he had any jurisdiction in the matters of the executive branch in the first place. Clearly, that judge's position is what should be in question, this is a matter of ego infecting justice.
You ASKED @ 17:45 mark of the video of any listeners could tell you why the administration used this 1798 act - TWO WORDS!!!
CASE LAW:
Specifically--Ludecke v. Watkins (1948)
Please Read the case majority, the administration is using it because it has decided case law that judiciary has no say no preview or jurisdiction in this 1798 act, and that the law essentially is free of due process.
Excellent
Did you consider Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 79 in your analysis re whether illegal aliens have due process rights?
The Diaz case was not being tested under the 1798 act it was about benefits and immigration status etc, no one in the Diaz case was being removed because of the alien eniemes act of 1798, the reason I believe the administration chose this act was because of the case law, when invoked, the executive has full discretion, and judiciary has no perview, per the case law 1948 wadkins case.
Seriously Sir. Do you still have TDS…..he does not do anything that would cause him to be on the wrong side of the law…you need to get over your TDS…..and he has terrific staff, maybe even better than you….though you are pretty good…except you get criminals off…..
Follow the money.
This is good.
Yes
Allegations specifying Dershowitz's extreme and serial pedophilic sexual deviancy with non-consenting underage children have STILL not been tried in any court. He still gets to visit his grandson and be present near a kindergarden or elementary school without being registered as a sexual offender. Similarly NONE of the scores of pedophilic predators have been indicted despite offenses committed in connection to the Epstein Grooming Gang and to a Mossad blackmail scheme using slightly post-puberty kids as honey bait.. Because they and Dershowitz have the world's best protectors.
Some may have been extrajudicially punished. Dr Henry Jarekie has been sued in New York Civil Court. Prince Andrew, like Dershowitz, had the very same child victim who was paid hush mney to drop her civil cases against both. . Allegations of Bill Gates involvement apparently led to dissolution of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. But the predators are STILL protected from Law Enforcement. Today is DAY 2440 of the Epstein Dershowitz cover-up. This is why no jury or judge gets to adjudicate the widespread allegations of pedophilia. Allegations against Dershowitz describe an extremely evil man. The explicit content and serial nature of the pedo allegations should put Manhattan Child Services on notice to restrict Dershowitz' visits with his grandson at least to the extent requiring a competent chaperone be present. Pedos are notorious recidivists. Child Services failed the children groomed in the Epstein Organization and it is doing nothing to protect Dershowitz's grandson.. It appears Dershowitz's hard core zionism led him to a desire to be useful to the cause, become best friends with the Agent Epstein, help him with finances and contacts and then protect him from Law Enforcement. And then came the underage childrens' complaints of brutal and drugged-into-compliance rape.. But Dersh has the world's best protection, as long a he does not squeal.
Dubious comments, and off subject.
Frank: you advertise your lack of knowledge on the subject.of allegations of Dershowitz's pedophilia. He could perhaps have won a trial with his ad hominem attacks on the groomed underage children. He called the 14 year olds "prostitutes, liars and thieves", white trailer park trash. It is incredible in America where the social instinct is to protect the vulnerable, especially the young children, that Dershowitz gets away with behaviour that the children underscored was pedophilic rape. Nothing dubious about this at all, Frank. Your fandom is exactly the distraction Dersh wants.Pedophilia is even against Jewish Law. Dersh did everything possible to avoid a trial because he did not want to be found guilty of pedo rape and child.traffickoing. He would have had to live in jail. .Is it better that the law was not enforced, that he avoided a trial by jury? Frank, you are literate but you know nothing of what Dersh did for Epstein? You never read the allegations? You do not know how Dersh got a full immunity for all pedo activity. You never learned about the Epstein-Dershowitz prdo cover-up? Frank!
There is pressure to release the covered up FBI files, including the criminal pedo investigation of Dersh and also including the interviews of Palm Beach Po,lice with 33 underage girls of the roughly 250 girls passing thru the Epstein pedo organization. Secretary Bondi has promised full release, but she is a newbie and may easily be stymied by the people supporting Dersh. Dersh no ,longer has that secret full immunity. It was revoked. Dersh did not know it violated the Federal Victims Rights Law. So much for the legal knowledge of a Harvard Emeritus. When news of the immunity and the sweetheart deal for Epstein leaked, Federal DA Acosta who had been improperly influenced, was forced to resign from his newly acquired job as Secretary of Labor. Frank, you write comments. why do you not research the background of the person you listen to and clearly admire? I am told that some people enjoy researching what Dersh allegedly did because it saves them the fees that the Dark Web and Pornhub charges. I and surely you are not one of these, but educated people should take time and effort to know about whatever Dersh did while intimately associated with Agent Epstein. And it is not too late for a trial, Secretary Bondi. There is no statute of limitation in New York or Florida on pedo rape. Anyone else would have been tried on thee allegations from so many children. Dersh may still receive justice.
BTW, as to Dersh there is no subject other than his alleged pedophilic rapes.and his ruination of the lives of what he deemed were trailer park trash.
Again, dubious comments, and off subject. Not saying your comments are not true, but find another podcast, etc., more fitting with your concerns. You are dangerously close to following liberals into a lawless landscape where nothing but rage rules. That's you!
Occasionally a man seems so egregiously immoral and yet protected from legal punishment that he needs to be directly confronted with the consequences of his immorality. You know, America is still a free country at least until the Senate enacts the IHRC definition of "antisemitism" into law. Frank, if you cannot be persuaded by what I write, just skip my comments, No skin off my teeth. I actually do not expect for example hard core Zionist to show empathy for victims of the Epstein Organization's almost industrial rapes of, according to AG Pam Bondi, 250 children who were mostly underage and all Gentile.
Furthermore my comments go to Dersh's judgement and credibility. If you had an open enough mind to be persuaded that Dershowitz had likely raped numerous groomed kids in a brutal fashion, despite his status in the Orthodox community groomed children, then you would probably apply your word of choice "dubious" to Dershowitz rather than hi investigators. Are you so biased you are not in the least interested in why Derhowitz did not want a trial and why a million dollars in huh money was paid? But you do not have to be skeptical about Dersh. Just read what you like.
I cannot spend more time with you. I am running down a rumor about deaths of a couple of the girls under grooming. If true,, then maybe some explicit or implicit confirmation can be found despite the comprehensive cover-up. Mr Dershowitz may of course choose to confirm this rumor if he, as Epstein's attirney, knows it is true. But he never would. Omerta.
Frothing at the mouth. Please seek help.
The help is being sought in the form of prosecutors indicting Dershowitz for pedophilic rape. Note Abolitionists in 1859 were accused of "frothing at the mouth". when they demanded slavery's prohibition. in the face of resistance by a Deep State, "frothing" may be a natural reaction on the way to achieving justice and ending immorality.
Excellent show today. I agree with your discussion. Thank you.