The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore. Sean "Diddy" Combs has allegedly evaded accountability for decades while others paid the price for his actions.
Take the 1999 nightclub shooting that left three people wounded. While Combs walked free, his protégé Shyne served nearly a decade in prison. The stark difference in their legal outcomes speaks volumes about how wealth and connections shape justice.
Today's verdict proves the point perfectly. Combs just walked away from the most serious federal charges—racketeering and sex trafficking that could have meant life in prison. His army of expensive lawyers managed to get him acquitted on the charges that really mattered, while he was only convicted on lesser prostitution-related offenses. For years, he operated with apparent impunity while his victims suffered in silence, and even now he's dodged the worst consequences.
Remember the Club New York incident where he was caught on surveillance throwing punches? His million-dollar legal team spun it as self-defense while his bodyguard took the fall. Classic playbook: shift blame, hire the best lawyers money can buy, and let someone else do the time.
This is what money buys in America's justice system. While Combs surrounded himself with PR specialists and legal dream teams that just saved him from life in prison, regular people sit in jail for months over missed court dates or minor offenses they can't afford to fight. He may face up to a decade for the lesser charges, but he beat the system on what should have been slam-dunk federal racketeering and trafficking cases.
The math is simple: if you're broke, you're screwed. Public defenders are overworked, bail is unaffordable, and plea deals become your only option even when you're innocent. But if you're worth hundreds of millions? You get to play by different rules entirely.
Diddy's story isn't unique—it's the blueprint. Rich defendants don't just buy freedom; they buy time, favorable coverage, and the ability to make problems disappear. Meanwhile, ordinary people get ground up by a system designed to extract guilty pleas and fill prison cells.
Justice in America has a price tag, and most people can't afford it.
Jeffey Weinstein knew Epstrin and Dershowitz and believes Epstein was a Mossad construct. Mossad used money from the etnically conscious donor class to "construct" Epstein, an up to then never-do-well, starting him off for five years in the Mideast arms trade and evolving him into a tax specialist and "Wall Street financer" with available asssets of around USD 600 million.
Maybe Mossad did the same with Dershowitz, "constructing" an Ivy League constitutional scholar who could use a celebrity position to be useful to accomplishing the aims of GOI agencies and leaders. This may explain how Dershowitz, escapes indictment. He was graphically and gag-inducingly accused of nonconsensual serial violations of statutory rape laws, incidentally described as a very old and particularly ugly old creepy man by a number of sexually enslaved underage children, and others also kept by Epstein as sex slaves. Judging from the content of the kids'allegations, there were apparently long periods of time during which Dersh got his rocks off while presumably never having consensual sex. But Dersh did not want these allegations of pedo rape and a connection to child sexual slavery to be adjudicated for veracity in a criminal court of law.
Once the allegations broke out, Dersh felt a needed for immunity.
What kind of influence is needed to get a federal DEI prosecutor (his name was Acosta) to issue ,Dershowitz a SECRET non-prosecution agreement (an immunity) covering aall pedophilic charges and furthermore covering four alleged co-conspirators? Could Leslie Wexner, the owner of Victorias Secret, or Leon Black, the omniverous Wall Street junk bond dealer, for example, buy this kind of immunity for Dersh? If so, why would they? And then there is the unexpected F***-up - - -despjte the massive effort in getting the immunity, even leaking to Acosta that Epstein, protected by Dershowitz, was running an intel operation using little kids' bodies as blackmail bait, , the immunity was invalidated 3 years later because it violated the Federal Victims Rights Act. (Dersh, a Harvard Law Professor, had not known about this Act!? Is this more evidence of Dersh being a "construct"?)
Though he still apparntly has access to plenty of money, health problems with ministrokes mean that for Dersh, the money still talks, especially on talk podcasts, but the BS is halting.
When everything is consensual it is hard to convict. Might be nasty, but when you return for more???Did he not pay her $20 million a few years ago and she got several million from a hotel. They did not present a reasonable case for racketeering. How many millions did this costs the state? Not remotely a fan of Diddy, but seems like some one in prosecutors office was caught up and wanted publicity or to meet Diddy. Dumb and dumber
When analyzing the content pf the Dershowitz sex charges, you might forget for most people other than Dersh, sex trafficking may involve Adults. Adults are as a starting point free to consent to a very wide variety of sexual activity up to but not including cannibalization. The enslaved underage kids charging Dershowitz were theoretically and generally protected by stunningly unenforced statutory rape laws which however did have the effect of eliminating the possibility that kids could consent to what Dersh allegedly did to them.
BTW, appreciate the reference to the judge in "My Cousin Vinnie", a film about a Brooklyn lawyer who managed a life without involvement in pedophilic crime..
Now I agree with everything except the beatings of the woman why wasn’t there a charge for that issue as an evidence of his cruelty and intentional coercion to perform certain transactional acts to get reprieve from agony .., be as it may there may not be a Constitutional Clause for this or there is it has to be instantiated to protect women why because we are a patriarchal society we cannot depend on all the male judges to decide unbiasedly @Andrew Weissmann @Gary Marcus @Marcia Coyle @Adam Kinzinger in this case woman wasn’t even married to DIDI and even if she was there has to be a limitation or for wise women any physical abuse should be a Prenuptial Agreement
Great show. I agree you are an excellent defence lawyer, but it doesn't mean you identify with the criminals you defend. That's your job to defend to the best of your ability, but it's the jury to decide guilty or innocent.
Well, lack of detailed knowledge of Dersh's activity is obviously no bar to being his cheerleader. The conclusion "excellent defense lawyer" sticks in the craw though. Dersh spent huge effort and peddled lots of influence and pressure to get a secret immunity for himself and four co-conspirators from pedo prosecution, yet screwed up the whole effort since he was unaware ---despite being a renowned celebrity self-promoting Harvard Law Professor the "most intellectual of all lawyers" that the Federal Victims Rights Act prohibited secret immunity grants.
How is that kind of apparent malpractice compatible with your conclusion? And does not this kind of malpractice set a low bar on "the best of (Dersh's) ability", see your last sentence which for some reason omitted "100%".
The Diddy Double Standard
The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore. Sean "Diddy" Combs has allegedly evaded accountability for decades while others paid the price for his actions.
Take the 1999 nightclub shooting that left three people wounded. While Combs walked free, his protégé Shyne served nearly a decade in prison. The stark difference in their legal outcomes speaks volumes about how wealth and connections shape justice.
Today's verdict proves the point perfectly. Combs just walked away from the most serious federal charges—racketeering and sex trafficking that could have meant life in prison. His army of expensive lawyers managed to get him acquitted on the charges that really mattered, while he was only convicted on lesser prostitution-related offenses. For years, he operated with apparent impunity while his victims suffered in silence, and even now he's dodged the worst consequences.
Remember the Club New York incident where he was caught on surveillance throwing punches? His million-dollar legal team spun it as self-defense while his bodyguard took the fall. Classic playbook: shift blame, hire the best lawyers money can buy, and let someone else do the time.
This is what money buys in America's justice system. While Combs surrounded himself with PR specialists and legal dream teams that just saved him from life in prison, regular people sit in jail for months over missed court dates or minor offenses they can't afford to fight. He may face up to a decade for the lesser charges, but he beat the system on what should have been slam-dunk federal racketeering and trafficking cases.
The math is simple: if you're broke, you're screwed. Public defenders are overworked, bail is unaffordable, and plea deals become your only option even when you're innocent. But if you're worth hundreds of millions? You get to play by different rules entirely.
Diddy's story isn't unique—it's the blueprint. Rich defendants don't just buy freedom; they buy time, favorable coverage, and the ability to make problems disappear. Meanwhile, ordinary people get ground up by a system designed to extract guilty pleas and fill prison cells.
Justice in America has a price tag, and most people can't afford it.
Do you fear naming Dershowitz specifically as an example of the "blueprint" of your penultimate paragraph?
Jeffey Weinstein knew Epstrin and Dershowitz and believes Epstein was a Mossad construct. Mossad used money from the etnically conscious donor class to "construct" Epstein, an up to then never-do-well, starting him off for five years in the Mideast arms trade and evolving him into a tax specialist and "Wall Street financer" with available asssets of around USD 600 million.
Maybe Mossad did the same with Dershowitz, "constructing" an Ivy League constitutional scholar who could use a celebrity position to be useful to accomplishing the aims of GOI agencies and leaders. This may explain how Dershowitz, escapes indictment. He was graphically and gag-inducingly accused of nonconsensual serial violations of statutory rape laws, incidentally described as a very old and particularly ugly old creepy man by a number of sexually enslaved underage children, and others also kept by Epstein as sex slaves. Judging from the content of the kids'allegations, there were apparently long periods of time during which Dersh got his rocks off while presumably never having consensual sex. But Dersh did not want these allegations of pedo rape and a connection to child sexual slavery to be adjudicated for veracity in a criminal court of law.
Once the allegations broke out, Dersh felt a needed for immunity.
What kind of influence is needed to get a federal DEI prosecutor (his name was Acosta) to issue ,Dershowitz a SECRET non-prosecution agreement (an immunity) covering aall pedophilic charges and furthermore covering four alleged co-conspirators? Could Leslie Wexner, the owner of Victorias Secret, or Leon Black, the omniverous Wall Street junk bond dealer, for example, buy this kind of immunity for Dersh? If so, why would they? And then there is the unexpected F***-up - - -despjte the massive effort in getting the immunity, even leaking to Acosta that Epstein, protected by Dershowitz, was running an intel operation using little kids' bodies as blackmail bait, , the immunity was invalidated 3 years later because it violated the Federal Victims Rights Act. (Dersh, a Harvard Law Professor, had not known about this Act!? Is this more evidence of Dersh being a "construct"?)
That's like the old sayings goes " money talks and bullshit walks" I wonder how many millions did the prosecutor office get from Diddy's lawyers
Though he still apparntly has access to plenty of money, health problems with ministrokes mean that for Dersh, the money still talks, especially on talk podcasts, but the BS is halting.
When everything is consensual it is hard to convict. Might be nasty, but when you return for more???Did he not pay her $20 million a few years ago and she got several million from a hotel. They did not present a reasonable case for racketeering. How many millions did this costs the state? Not remotely a fan of Diddy, but seems like some one in prosecutors office was caught up and wanted publicity or to meet Diddy. Dumb and dumber
You think SEX TRAFFICKING is consensual? Are you on drugs?
When analyzing the content pf the Dershowitz sex charges, you might forget for most people other than Dersh, sex trafficking may involve Adults. Adults are as a starting point free to consent to a very wide variety of sexual activity up to but not including cannibalization. The enslaved underage kids charging Dershowitz were theoretically and generally protected by stunningly unenforced statutory rape laws which however did have the effect of eliminating the possibility that kids could consent to what Dersh allegedly did to them.
BTW, appreciate the reference to the judge in "My Cousin Vinnie", a film about a Brooklyn lawyer who managed a life without involvement in pedophilic crime..
The Moussad is everywhere—even Zohran Mamdani is a Moussad plant!!
Combs is too big to fail!!
Now I agree with everything except the beatings of the woman why wasn’t there a charge for that issue as an evidence of his cruelty and intentional coercion to perform certain transactional acts to get reprieve from agony .., be as it may there may not be a Constitutional Clause for this or there is it has to be instantiated to protect women why because we are a patriarchal society we cannot depend on all the male judges to decide unbiasedly @Andrew Weissmann @Gary Marcus @Marcia Coyle @Adam Kinzinger in this case woman wasn’t even married to DIDI and even if she was there has to be a limitation or for wise women any physical abuse should be a Prenuptial Agreement
Great show. I agree you are an excellent defence lawyer, but it doesn't mean you identify with the criminals you defend. That's your job to defend to the best of your ability, but it's the jury to decide guilty or innocent.
Well, lack of detailed knowledge of Dersh's activity is obviously no bar to being his cheerleader. The conclusion "excellent defense lawyer" sticks in the craw though. Dersh spent huge effort and peddled lots of influence and pressure to get a secret immunity for himself and four co-conspirators from pedo prosecution, yet screwed up the whole effort since he was unaware ---despite being a renowned celebrity self-promoting Harvard Law Professor the "most intellectual of all lawyers" that the Federal Victims Rights Act prohibited secret immunity grants.
How is that kind of apparent malpractice compatible with your conclusion? And does not this kind of malpractice set a low bar on "the best of (Dersh's) ability", see your last sentence which for some reason omitted "100%".
And juries, judges, and prosecutors are bought off every damn day in this country. That is how the 'system' really works.