DERSHOWITZ AND THE ART OF MALINFORMATION. !"Support the Alan Dershowitz Newsletter, Defense of civil liberties, human and Constitutional Rights for all". ... Seriously distorting the reality of what Dershowitz did and does, just as when he claims as a 73 year old in front of naked, drugged underage girls, he had his underpants on at all times. Clearly the cited phrase is not meant for Palestinians in the Holy Land, or even Christians there, or critics of israel on American college campuses, or underage girls trapped by, not coincidentally, a Zionist almost-billonaire, Jeff Epstein, who was very close ideologically and personally to Alan Dershowitz for about 20 years, yet Alan never informed law enforcement about what was happening to more than 100 underage groomed and often semiconscious girls. Alan was quoted as saying the children were "prostitutes", apparently therefore not worth saving by reporting Epstein to Child Protection Services. And of course Dershowitz was credibly accused by multiple children of having sampled Epstein's product. There was a criminal investigation of Dershowitz for child rape and trafficking. No court ever found Dershowitz innocent.. He relied on lots of legal intimidation to obstruct the proceedings of justice, foreign intelligence agents to make mafia-like threatening phone calls, career incentives to a federal DA who granted secret immunity and afterwards became Secretary of Labor, and not least to cover the civil end, hush money payments ro one accuser in a monetary sum more than 8 times higher than Michael Cohen paid to Stormy Daniels.
Dershowitz does not get punished. Instead he gets to stay the center of attention with his own dull rehash of news in his podcast and his pugnacious appearances on talk shows, where he opines about everything except the feeling of raping an underage doped child, the trembling of her body,her teats and crying, and her subsewuent life of posttraumaric stress and descent into drug addiction followed by overdoees or sometimes suicide.
That's right. Look to Dershowitz to inform you of your civil liberties. I expext that was his introductory lecture to those naked drugged girls on the second floor of 11 E 71st Street when he first met them outside his office on the same floor, surely in his underpants?
There is plenty of evidence for a Federal or State Grand Jury to consider an indictmentnonconsensual child rape and sex trafficking interstate. of Dershowitz for . If he is not indicted and the jury has not been bought, ok, then maybe all the kids lied or exaggerated. But it has been so long with Dershowitz avoiding trial...and Dershowitz looks like a really bad, disgusting, even gag-incing guy. Picture the allegation of a naked semiconscious groomed girl lying with a memorably physically decaying 73 year old. now only in his underpants, helping himself to the compliant but tearful girl. We need a court to determine if that 73 year old was Dershowitz.
And while students express fury and outrage at blatant genocide paid for by the USA, the Biden-Harris administration under the financial pressure of AIPAC, ancient Dershowitz still whitewashes that genocide. .Obviously Dershowitz does not want us to believe what we can see with better eyes than his, those videos/films we see made inter alia by brutish IDF soldiers themselves who blithely posted indiscretely on tictok or the dark web. Would Dershowitz like at this time to confess to his doings in connection with Jeff Epstein's operations? Would Dershowitz like to tell us what Bill Clinton and Bill Gates were doing, and where is thje Epstein film archive and the famous black book.,. Surely as 1) Epstein's personal attorney for about a generation, and as 2) Epstein's personal trophy presented during meetings with the bigwigs Epstein tried to charm, Dershowitz is not in fear of being suicided if he finally tells the truth and nothing but the truth. Truth, objective reality truth would be so much more satisfying than Dershow's regularly inane speculations on -NY Times headlines
Why should anyone have listened to someone who failed to condemn the slaughter of babies and children in Germany in 1945?
Once a regime goes full Nazi by sending out death squads to slaughter noncombatants, the proper & necessary response is invasion and regime destruction. The Allied invasion of Normandy killed ~20,000 French civilians. Was Eisenhower a war criminal, or is war often unavoidably tragic?
Masybe David should educate himself before commenting, and resd the text of internatiional humanitarian Law and also the Genocide Convention. David can google them. Closed, biased, unknowlegeable minds contribute nothing
Maybe Greg should educate himself about how to refute a position before commenting.
Greg might try quoting the laws he implies Israel has broken.
Those laws being rather vague, to do this Greg might realize that he needs to look to actual examples of how wars have been fought in the last century. Indeed, Greg needs to argue either that Israel shouldn't try to conquer Hamas, or that some other nation would or has conquered such a territory while killing less than 2% of the population (itself a questionable figure which depends on trusting the statistics of Hamas, which we know from both anecdote and statistics inflates its death counts).
Greg's closed, biased, unknowledgeable mind has so far contributed nothing.
Oh dear. Young David continues writing comments without researching, claiming when he does not read the text of International Humanitarian Law and the Genocide Convention, which I specifically urged the young man in writing to read, that I need to "quote the laws (I) imply Israel has broken." I am not given enough space by substack to write 95 Theses, as Martin Luther did. The ICJ and ICC trials were broadcast in their entirety 6 months ago. They are still avqilable. Try Googling. Presumably David received no education from them. Perhaps David can rebutt with a point that democracy gives equal rights to both the educated and the uneducated, those who research an issue and those who dispense with that. He can quote Senator Karl Mundt "Our democracy represents both smart people and dumb people as long as they are Americans. Our Congress is jam packed with smart people, so we need some dumb people there to represent the less intelligent in our society. Gee, Congressman Pitteli, has a nice ring to it. AIPAC will invite him to a 2 week guided vacation to the Holy Land. I bet in his whole life he will never read the International Humanitarian Law or Genocide Convention text. Is that too sharp, David? Prove me wrong, young man!
That's a lot of writing to not use any words to make an actual argument.
I suspect that you are not stupid enough to claim either that Israel is not allowed to conquer Gaza, or that Israel could conquer Gaza without killing many noncombatants. Knowing you are defeated, you stick to ad hominem and word salad.
You still have made no argument at all except "trust me, I have done the research".
You must believe either that Israel is not allowed to conquer Gaza, or that Israel could conquer Gaza without killing many noncombatants. Which is it?
Your claims wrt international law are as baseless as your assumption of my age (I am 58). I challenge you to provide any quote from IHL or GC that clearly applies to the situation in Gaza today. ("Killing members of the group" is IMHO as close as it comes, but that happens in essentially every war and would happen regardless of who was invading Gaza.)
David: you are too young perhaps to understand the mature concept of proportionality, a concept you will encounter when you first read international Humanitarian Law, an international treaty surprisingly ratfied by the very country now investigated by the ICJ for egregious breach of those obligations. If you read the history of that law, you will learn that it was a reaction to the horrors of Nazi military tactics against civilians. I disagree fully with the content of your first sentence. I agree fully with the content of the first clause of your second, and cite the above-mentioned concept of proportionality and the reading material I suggested specifically that you read. Of course it does no good to read new information if you have a strong bias against it If I can suggest this delicately with the least possible offense: you write as if you have incorporated not much new information about Israel or war or argumentation since you were 18, You might consider the starting point that Israel might not be always on the side of saints (especially with Netanyahu, Ben Gvir and Smotrich running the show and all three urging the IDF to treat Palestinians like Israelites did the Amaleks). and look for eventual information supporting that. Then you are starting to see both sides of an issue, something many people learn after they are 18.
I agree and support 100% today's discussion....until you got the letters and said that you think Hillary would have made a great president. You lose me on that one....lol....ridiculous... Hillary, next to Biden, is the most deeply corrupt politician in today's America. You could never convince me otherwise.
Principled, ethical, logical approach to the contemptuous behavior of groups that want to skirt the Constitution. I agree this must be stopped. Are we going to allow mistreatment and abuse of students on the public dime? Why are university administrations so spineless? Yikes.
DERSHOWITZ AND THE ART OF MALINFORMATION. !"Support the Alan Dershowitz Newsletter, Defense of civil liberties, human and Constitutional Rights for all". ... Seriously distorting the reality of what Dershowitz did and does, just as when he claims as a 73 year old in front of naked, drugged underage girls, he had his underpants on at all times. Clearly the cited phrase is not meant for Palestinians in the Holy Land, or even Christians there, or critics of israel on American college campuses, or underage girls trapped by, not coincidentally, a Zionist almost-billonaire, Jeff Epstein, who was very close ideologically and personally to Alan Dershowitz for about 20 years, yet Alan never informed law enforcement about what was happening to more than 100 underage groomed and often semiconscious girls. Alan was quoted as saying the children were "prostitutes", apparently therefore not worth saving by reporting Epstein to Child Protection Services. And of course Dershowitz was credibly accused by multiple children of having sampled Epstein's product. There was a criminal investigation of Dershowitz for child rape and trafficking. No court ever found Dershowitz innocent.. He relied on lots of legal intimidation to obstruct the proceedings of justice, foreign intelligence agents to make mafia-like threatening phone calls, career incentives to a federal DA who granted secret immunity and afterwards became Secretary of Labor, and not least to cover the civil end, hush money payments ro one accuser in a monetary sum more than 8 times higher than Michael Cohen paid to Stormy Daniels.
Dershowitz does not get punished. Instead he gets to stay the center of attention with his own dull rehash of news in his podcast and his pugnacious appearances on talk shows, where he opines about everything except the feeling of raping an underage doped child, the trembling of her body,her teats and crying, and her subsewuent life of posttraumaric stress and descent into drug addiction followed by overdoees or sometimes suicide.
That's right. Look to Dershowitz to inform you of your civil liberties. I expext that was his introductory lecture to those naked drugged girls on the second floor of 11 E 71st Street when he first met them outside his office on the same floor, surely in his underpants?
There is plenty of evidence for a Federal or State Grand Jury to consider an indictmentnonconsensual child rape and sex trafficking interstate. of Dershowitz for . If he is not indicted and the jury has not been bought, ok, then maybe all the kids lied or exaggerated. But it has been so long with Dershowitz avoiding trial...and Dershowitz looks like a really bad, disgusting, even gag-incing guy. Picture the allegation of a naked semiconscious groomed girl lying with a memorably physically decaying 73 year old. now only in his underpants, helping himself to the compliant but tearful girl. We need a court to determine if that 73 year old was Dershowitz.
And while students express fury and outrage at blatant genocide paid for by the USA, the Biden-Harris administration under the financial pressure of AIPAC, ancient Dershowitz still whitewashes that genocide. .Obviously Dershowitz does not want us to believe what we can see with better eyes than his, those videos/films we see made inter alia by brutish IDF soldiers themselves who blithely posted indiscretely on tictok or the dark web. Would Dershowitz like at this time to confess to his doings in connection with Jeff Epstein's operations? Would Dershowitz like to tell us what Bill Clinton and Bill Gates were doing, and where is thje Epstein film archive and the famous black book.,. Surely as 1) Epstein's personal attorney for about a generation, and as 2) Epstein's personal trophy presented during meetings with the bigwigs Epstein tried to charm, Dershowitz is not in fear of being suicided if he finally tells the truth and nothing but the truth. Truth, objective reality truth would be so much more satisfying than Dershow's regularly inane speculations on -NY Times headlines
Why should anyone listen to someone who fails wholeheartedly to condemn the slaughter of babies and children beneath the rubble of Gaza?
So why doesn’t Hamas just bring them into the tunnels?
Why should anyone have listened to someone who failed to condemn the slaughter of babies and children in Germany in 1945?
Once a regime goes full Nazi by sending out death squads to slaughter noncombatants, the proper & necessary response is invasion and regime destruction. The Allied invasion of Normandy killed ~20,000 French civilians. Was Eisenhower a war criminal, or is war often unavoidably tragic?
Masybe David should educate himself before commenting, and resd the text of internatiional humanitarian Law and also the Genocide Convention. David can google them. Closed, biased, unknowlegeable minds contribute nothing
Maybe Greg should educate himself about how to refute a position before commenting.
Greg might try quoting the laws he implies Israel has broken.
Those laws being rather vague, to do this Greg might realize that he needs to look to actual examples of how wars have been fought in the last century. Indeed, Greg needs to argue either that Israel shouldn't try to conquer Hamas, or that some other nation would or has conquered such a territory while killing less than 2% of the population (itself a questionable figure which depends on trusting the statistics of Hamas, which we know from both anecdote and statistics inflates its death counts).
Greg's closed, biased, unknowledgeable mind has so far contributed nothing.
Oh dear. Young David continues writing comments without researching, claiming when he does not read the text of International Humanitarian Law and the Genocide Convention, which I specifically urged the young man in writing to read, that I need to "quote the laws (I) imply Israel has broken." I am not given enough space by substack to write 95 Theses, as Martin Luther did. The ICJ and ICC trials were broadcast in their entirety 6 months ago. They are still avqilable. Try Googling. Presumably David received no education from them. Perhaps David can rebutt with a point that democracy gives equal rights to both the educated and the uneducated, those who research an issue and those who dispense with that. He can quote Senator Karl Mundt "Our democracy represents both smart people and dumb people as long as they are Americans. Our Congress is jam packed with smart people, so we need some dumb people there to represent the less intelligent in our society. Gee, Congressman Pitteli, has a nice ring to it. AIPAC will invite him to a 2 week guided vacation to the Holy Land. I bet in his whole life he will never read the International Humanitarian Law or Genocide Convention text. Is that too sharp, David? Prove me wrong, young man!
That's a lot of writing to not use any words to make an actual argument.
I suspect that you are not stupid enough to claim either that Israel is not allowed to conquer Gaza, or that Israel could conquer Gaza without killing many noncombatants. Knowing you are defeated, you stick to ad hominem and word salad.
You still have made no argument at all except "trust me, I have done the research".
You must believe either that Israel is not allowed to conquer Gaza, or that Israel could conquer Gaza without killing many noncombatants. Which is it?
Your claims wrt international law are as baseless as your assumption of my age (I am 58). I challenge you to provide any quote from IHL or GC that clearly applies to the situation in Gaza today. ("Killing members of the group" is IMHO as close as it comes, but that happens in essentially every war and would happen regardless of who was invading Gaza.)
David: you are too young perhaps to understand the mature concept of proportionality, a concept you will encounter when you first read international Humanitarian Law, an international treaty surprisingly ratfied by the very country now investigated by the ICJ for egregious breach of those obligations. If you read the history of that law, you will learn that it was a reaction to the horrors of Nazi military tactics against civilians. I disagree fully with the content of your first sentence. I agree fully with the content of the first clause of your second, and cite the above-mentioned concept of proportionality and the reading material I suggested specifically that you read. Of course it does no good to read new information if you have a strong bias against it If I can suggest this delicately with the least possible offense: you write as if you have incorporated not much new information about Israel or war or argumentation since you were 18, You might consider the starting point that Israel might not be always on the side of saints (especially with Netanyahu, Ben Gvir and Smotrich running the show and all three urging the IDF to treat Palestinians like Israelites did the Amaleks). and look for eventual information supporting that. Then you are starting to see both sides of an issue, something many people learn after they are 18.
https://substack.com/@justjoy/note/c-67198194?r=1ud6cj&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
I agree and support 100% today's discussion....until you got the letters and said that you think Hillary would have made a great president. You lose me on that one....lol....ridiculous... Hillary, next to Biden, is the most deeply corrupt politician in today's America. You could never convince me otherwise.
Principled, ethical, logical approach to the contemptuous behavior of groups that want to skirt the Constitution. I agree this must be stopped. Are we going to allow mistreatment and abuse of students on the public dime? Why are university administrations so spineless? Yikes.
I presume Eileen that you forgot to consider the first Amendment. Best not skip civics class.