Following the Maxwell conviction, BBC requested an interview, during which I explicitly stated that I , Prince Andrew and other people had been accused of having sex with Virginia Guffre. I commented on the prosecution’s wise decision not to use her as a witness because of her lack of credibility.
Epstein hid his perversions very carefully from many good people with whom he worked. Guilt by association is a tactic of fascism with which you seem all too comfortable.
I believe you! I knew of a woman who wept with complete shock when she discovered the man she was devoted to was a pervert; she claimed he was super nice, very well spoken, with a professional job, and his other venture was running a brothel with young girls. She said she never saw it, because everybody new him to be a lovely likeable man, and he shielded his entire enterprise very thoroughly! It very sad how people jump to judge without thinking!
Epstein tried compromise a lot of influential, high achieving, or wealthy people, hoping to benefit by controlling them, drawing them by stages into his inner circle. He hid his predilections from those who proved incorruptible. He tried with you. He failed. Your innocence is beyond question.
So you went to Epstein's private island on the Lolita Express, claim that you got "only a massage" and are now upset that your credibility is being questioned?
I was under oath and subject to cross examination when I swore In deposition that I never met Guiffre. I asked the fbi to investigate me and her. I hope they are.
Alan: your first advice to a client in your position would be to shut up! Yet here your are in a public forum sort of dangling shiny objects in very carefully crafted comments to undermine your accuser. The prosecutors don't believe her so no one should. Shut up and get ready for a trial.
Surely there is something that can be done to protect the innocent against people like Guiffre. It seems that any woman can open her mouth and wreck a life. It is time that some action was taken like people like her. I wonder how much of the evidence against Maxwell is a pack of lies. Created falsehoods by vicious women to show power. Terrible what you have to deal with.
I didn’t “associate” with Epstein once I learned of the accusations against him. Before that presidents, deans , Nobel prize winners all associated with him academically.
You can’t stand up in a theater and yell fire but you can stand up and ruin lives with lies. Part of the problem lies with lawyers. They have abandoned the advocacy of the spirited pursuit of the truth for model of win at all costs.
The problem was/is the radical Pro-Choice group "jumped the shark." However distasteful abortion was to some, many saw it as an argument between two radical groups, when was the beginning of life. That, until late term and birth canal abortions became more prevalent. Then it was no longer a mass, people saw it differently. It had the shape and features of a baby; it was in the womb allowing organs to develop so it can exist on its own. Late term got attention, changed people's attitude.
Mr.Dershowitz is a decent man. Since he is a passionate defender of law, one side (the side opposite to him on that day) dislikes him. His defending of Trump and some of the so called liberals hate for Trump made him a lonely person on the left. Actully Mr.Dershowitz is the true liberal. Some the current liberals are just communists and thugs. With all that said, Mr.Dershowitz, it is not that I don't believe you, but in the interest of clarity maybe you can put some dates (does not have to be exact) on your interactions with Mr. Epstein. For example : First met 1989. Last met 2008. Include a few important dates in between. This is just my example. Please, if you could. Note to hater: Please don't start asking the Mr.Dershowitz about these fictional dates. These are just my examples
"Some the current liberals are just communists and thugs."
Like the ones who attacked the Capitol on J6?
Those thugs?
The ones with the Confederate flags and the Auschwitz sweatshirts?
As for Communists, the truth is that you wouldn't know a Communist from an Impressionist, and your attempted defense of Dershowitz is more of a liability than an asset in his portfolio.
And do you call everyone who disagrees with you a 'hater'?
If I thought that your opinion was worth as much as two cents I'd view it as a badge of honor, but it isn't, so I don't.
those who attacked capitol and broke the law are sitting in the jail. But those (whatever name you want to call them - communist, progressives etc.) who burned down cities, destroyed statues and burned federal building are walking free and doing more of the same. Clearly there were thugs in capitol. No body is denying it. You interpret my comments as condoning that behavior. I don't condone violence from either side. But I don't belive what happened in capitol was an insurrection. Even poor people from third world countries know how to execute an insurrection better than that. I think what happened was no one anticipated it will get out of hand. So Nancy was not prepared with better security. In fact, she turn down offer of national guard help two days before the incident. If there was enough security, no one would have broken into capitol. This is not to justify those who broken in. 6 months before the capitol incident there was a run on the whitehouse in the middle of the night. The secret service were able to push it back. The next day all liberal news papers had headlines that said - scared Trump had to be taken to the bunker. Nobody from the left seemed to deplore that incident. They seemed to have enjoyed it. The only difference between capitol incident and the whitehouse incident was in one instance security was able to push the protesters back, in the other incident the protester got the upper hand. We as a society, condone violence, when it suits us. Law breaking is wrong in every instance whether that happens at the white house or in the capitol or on the souther border. If we prosecute them all equally, the crime will stop.
Much too long to respond to in detail at this time.
Riddled with easily refutable crapola, which I would have to take apart line by line.
At some point I'll get to it, but clearly you're just another right-wing trump stooge with a typically sub-par IQ.
If you're gullible enough to believe trump's lies, the greatest being that he's fit to be President of the United States, you're gullible enough to believe Dershowitz, too.
I guess everyone who does not agree with the radical left that destory this country is a trump stooge, in your opinion and has a sub-par IQ. I am a foreigner who came to this country and live here comfortably (I mean by working hard). You are the first one pointed out my subpar IQ. Thank you. I see a lot of whiners and complainers on the left. I used to be a liberal and still probably a liberal. But I am sick and tired of the lefts propoganda. I bet you never lived in an autocracy. I have and I will leave it there. I don't know the personal lives of Dershowitz or Trump. But I opined only because these are two people who love this beautiful country.
Nancy turned down Trump's offer of the National Guard. It has been revealed that she had her daughter inside the Capitol building with video equipment, while her son-in-law filmed outside. The whole thing looks staged. Crowd control as a means of political manipulation has been a feature of every color revolution.
Your name calling bigotry speaks for itself.
Epstein hid his perversions very carefully from many good people with whom he worked. Guilt by association is a tactic of fascism with which you seem all too comfortable.
I believe you! I knew of a woman who wept with complete shock when she discovered the man she was devoted to was a pervert; she claimed he was super nice, very well spoken, with a professional job, and his other venture was running a brothel with young girls. She said she never saw it, because everybody new him to be a lovely likeable man, and he shielded his entire enterprise very thoroughly! It very sad how people jump to judge without thinking!
You believe him.
So what?
You back it up well some utterly irrelevant story.
It be great to do a BBC Interview, because the media and the public are one sided! The neglectful parents have a lot to answer for.
Epstein tried compromise a lot of influential, high achieving, or wealthy people, hoping to benefit by controlling them, drawing them by stages into his inner circle. He hid his predilections from those who proved incorruptible. He tried with you. He failed. Your innocence is beyond question.
I did absolutely nothing wrong.
Says every single inmate ever.
And you would know?
I never saw an underage girl at Epstein’s house. Read the butlers subsequent affidavit.
Just read the short introduction. It summarizes the evidence. You probably won’t because you don’t want the truth but hopefully others will
What about proof of guilt? There is none. Merely an accusation by a woman with a long history of lying for money about prominent people.
It is easy. I met with him and his other lawyers until he pleaded guilty. No young people were present. Sorry to disappoint your prurient interest.
So you went to Epstein's private island on the Lolita Express, claim that you got "only a massage" and are now upset that your credibility is being questioned?
Is that about it?
All false.
You didn't go to his island, you didn't claim, "only a massage", you're not upset?
Terse replies without further explanations are less than uh, satisfying.
Read my book and check my documentation. And you will get my answers. I did nothing wrong or even questionable as you will see. It’s free on kindle.
We're you under oath when you wrote your book? Big difference at a deposition or on cross examination as you well know.
I was under oath and subject to cross examination when I swore In deposition that I never met Guiffre. I asked the fbi to investigate me and her. I hope they are.
How many Maxwell girls did you rape, Dershowitz?
I’ve had sexual contact only with my wife since well before I met Epstein. I never met Guiffre, which she acknowledged in her writing
Rape isn't sexual, it is violence. But nice dodge, counselor.
Now answer my original question please.
Rape is sexual violence.
Alan: your first advice to a client in your position would be to shut up! Yet here your are in a public forum sort of dangling shiny objects in very carefully crafted comments to undermine your accuser. The prosecutors don't believe her so no one should. Shut up and get ready for a trial.
I’m ready. And I will continue to speak the truth.
Surely there is something that can be done to protect the innocent against people like Guiffre. It seems that any woman can open her mouth and wreck a life. It is time that some action was taken like people like her. I wonder how much of the evidence against Maxwell is a pack of lies. Created falsehoods by vicious women to show power. Terrible what you have to deal with.
You monster.
Is name calling the best you can do. ? Be substantive — if you can.
I didn’t “associate” with Epstein once I learned of the accusations against him. Before that presidents, deans , Nobel prize winners all associated with him academically.
Apparently, not that easy
Well said!
Qué asco de persona es este cabrón.
You can’t stand up in a theater and yell fire but you can stand up and ruin lives with lies. Part of the problem lies with lawyers. They have abandoned the advocacy of the spirited pursuit of the truth for model of win at all costs.
The problem was/is the radical Pro-Choice group "jumped the shark." However distasteful abortion was to some, many saw it as an argument between two radical groups, when was the beginning of life. That, until late term and birth canal abortions became more prevalent. Then it was no longer a mass, people saw it differently. It had the shape and features of a baby; it was in the womb allowing organs to develop so it can exist on its own. Late term got attention, changed people's attitude.
Interestingly no one has cross examined Virginia Guffre untruths and lies!
Mr.Dershowitz is a decent man. Since he is a passionate defender of law, one side (the side opposite to him on that day) dislikes him. His defending of Trump and some of the so called liberals hate for Trump made him a lonely person on the left. Actully Mr.Dershowitz is the true liberal. Some the current liberals are just communists and thugs. With all that said, Mr.Dershowitz, it is not that I don't believe you, but in the interest of clarity maybe you can put some dates (does not have to be exact) on your interactions with Mr. Epstein. For example : First met 1989. Last met 2008. Include a few important dates in between. This is just my example. Please, if you could. Note to hater: Please don't start asking the Mr.Dershowitz about these fictional dates. These are just my examples
"Some the current liberals are just communists and thugs."
Like the ones who attacked the Capitol on J6?
Those thugs?
The ones with the Confederate flags and the Auschwitz sweatshirts?
As for Communists, the truth is that you wouldn't know a Communist from an Impressionist, and your attempted defense of Dershowitz is more of a liability than an asset in his portfolio.
And do you call everyone who disagrees with you a 'hater'?
If I thought that your opinion was worth as much as two cents I'd view it as a badge of honor, but it isn't, so I don't.
those who attacked capitol and broke the law are sitting in the jail. But those (whatever name you want to call them - communist, progressives etc.) who burned down cities, destroyed statues and burned federal building are walking free and doing more of the same. Clearly there were thugs in capitol. No body is denying it. You interpret my comments as condoning that behavior. I don't condone violence from either side. But I don't belive what happened in capitol was an insurrection. Even poor people from third world countries know how to execute an insurrection better than that. I think what happened was no one anticipated it will get out of hand. So Nancy was not prepared with better security. In fact, she turn down offer of national guard help two days before the incident. If there was enough security, no one would have broken into capitol. This is not to justify those who broken in. 6 months before the capitol incident there was a run on the whitehouse in the middle of the night. The secret service were able to push it back. The next day all liberal news papers had headlines that said - scared Trump had to be taken to the bunker. Nobody from the left seemed to deplore that incident. They seemed to have enjoyed it. The only difference between capitol incident and the whitehouse incident was in one instance security was able to push the protesters back, in the other incident the protester got the upper hand. We as a society, condone violence, when it suits us. Law breaking is wrong in every instance whether that happens at the white house or in the capitol or on the souther border. If we prosecute them all equally, the crime will stop.
Much too long to respond to in detail at this time.
Riddled with easily refutable crapola, which I would have to take apart line by line.
At some point I'll get to it, but clearly you're just another right-wing trump stooge with a typically sub-par IQ.
If you're gullible enough to believe trump's lies, the greatest being that he's fit to be President of the United States, you're gullible enough to believe Dershowitz, too.
I guess everyone who does not agree with the radical left that destory this country is a trump stooge, in your opinion and has a sub-par IQ. I am a foreigner who came to this country and live here comfortably (I mean by working hard). You are the first one pointed out my subpar IQ. Thank you. I see a lot of whiners and complainers on the left. I used to be a liberal and still probably a liberal. But I am sick and tired of the lefts propoganda. I bet you never lived in an autocracy. I have and I will leave it there. I don't know the personal lives of Dershowitz or Trump. But I opined only because these are two people who love this beautiful country.
Trump loves only himself, and if you think otherwise, you're either naive, gullible, stupid or all three.
So don't even think of lecturing me, you don't know what you're talking about.
I said I'd answer your first post when I get to it, now you've given me more crap to unpack.
Nancy turned down Trump's offer of the National Guard. It has been revealed that she had her daughter inside the Capitol building with video equipment, while her son-in-law filmed outside. The whole thing looks staged. Crowd control as a means of political manipulation has been a feature of every color revolution.