does the court of public opinion exist? yes. is it fair and just? never- and neither is life. a fairly achieved public image is not a right; there is no judge arbitrate objections. if a person is found to be innocent (by the judicial system, not the media), they have recourse.
if one values their public perception, one should cultivate awareness as to how their actions (legal or not) may be perceived/misconstrued.
so long as he’s not being denied his legal rights, this appeal to the media/public is self-indulgent window-dressing.
does the court of public opinion exist? yes. is it fair and just? never- and neither is life. a fairly achieved public image is not a right; there is no judge arbitrate objections. if a person is found to be innocent (by the judicial system, not the media), they have recourse.
if one values their public perception, one should cultivate awareness as to how their actions (legal or not) may be perceived/misconstrued.
so long as he’s not being denied his legal rights, this appeal to the media/public is self-indulgent window-dressing.
And who is paying her legal team? Or did they take it on “contingency”.