Wow, you are so interesting! I want to date you. You are certainly Mr or Ms Right. Imagine Dershow functioning as Grindr. Finally Dershow functions as something useful rather than just an ego manifestation.
Dershowitz says he is going to sue Jack Schlosssberg who said on youtube that Dershowitz was responsible for killing his first wife, Sue Barlach. A prolific litigant of defamation lawsuits as settlement bargining chips, Dersh says his attorneys think he has a "viable" case.
"Viable" is separated by an ocean from "winner". It is public record ( even goggleable) that the judge in the Dershowitz-Barlach divorce case wrote a binding decision stating that Dershowitz repeatedly physically beat up Barlach so much that hospitalization was required and psychologically tormented and abused her so much that long term psychiatric therapy was needed. My legal analysis is that Dersh should never go to court . He will lose and lose both badly and irretrievably .
Maybe Dersh hopes the Kennedy family will offer some settlement nuisance money, maybe one dollar and a retraction.. Were I Schlossberg's attorney, I would stress the connection between what arguably was 1) systematic physical and psychological abuse and beating, 2) the need for long-term psychiatric therapy and 3) the death (the coroner thought probably suicide, jumping off Brooklyn Bridge).. I would find some way of bringing the association between Epstein and Dershowitz into the case. Maybe Barlach, a strict Orthodox Jewish mother of Dersh's two children, knew and objected, just as Melissa Gates did regarding her husband, to the association with pedophile Epstein. I would depose the two children to find out what they remembered. I would bring in Barlach's surviving family. Her sister had married Dershowitz's brother Nathan and died, hit by a car as she rode a bike, some years after Sue, Then there will be the issues about why Dersh beat his wife. Was it systematic or was there a onetime grievance that was fairly limited in time? Did she throw out something important to him? Maybe his baseball card collection or porn magazines? If so, we go into details. Like what kind of porn or which baseball team? Had the sister said anything about the relationship between Sue and Dersh perhaps illuminating a motive for beating or even killing? Was Dersh trying to drive Sue insane? Dershowitz will not win this case. Given the glass house he has constructed with his life's energy. Dersh best shut up. and leave Schlossberg alone.
Another excellent show. I agree with all your comments and observations. Thank you.
I agree Mr. D. I'm a Sid Ceasar fan, especially when he pretends to speak other languages. The slapstick and subtly of his humor was so divine.
I also enjoy a Tom Lehrer song from time to time too. Vatican Rag is one of my favorites.
Wow, you are so interesting! I want to date you. You are certainly Mr or Ms Right. Imagine Dershow functioning as Grindr. Finally Dershow functions as something useful rather than just an ego manifestation.
Please help my Atty friend 🙏
https://open.substack.com/pub/joaniehiggs/p/reiner-fuellmich-could-use-our-help
Genesis 12:3, ibid 50:20
I was the last to interview him live :( Torah says everywhere we are commanded not to fear. Valuable info:
https://weaponizednews.com/world-news/covid-19-will-we-ever-get-justice-with-reiner-fuellmich/
Dershowitz says he is going to sue Jack Schlosssberg who said on youtube that Dershowitz was responsible for killing his first wife, Sue Barlach. A prolific litigant of defamation lawsuits as settlement bargining chips, Dersh says his attorneys think he has a "viable" case.
"Viable" is separated by an ocean from "winner". It is public record ( even goggleable) that the judge in the Dershowitz-Barlach divorce case wrote a binding decision stating that Dershowitz repeatedly physically beat up Barlach so much that hospitalization was required and psychologically tormented and abused her so much that long term psychiatric therapy was needed. My legal analysis is that Dersh should never go to court . He will lose and lose both badly and irretrievably .
Maybe Dersh hopes the Kennedy family will offer some settlement nuisance money, maybe one dollar and a retraction.. Were I Schlossberg's attorney, I would stress the connection between what arguably was 1) systematic physical and psychological abuse and beating, 2) the need for long-term psychiatric therapy and 3) the death (the coroner thought probably suicide, jumping off Brooklyn Bridge).. I would find some way of bringing the association between Epstein and Dershowitz into the case. Maybe Barlach, a strict Orthodox Jewish mother of Dersh's two children, knew and objected, just as Melissa Gates did regarding her husband, to the association with pedophile Epstein. I would depose the two children to find out what they remembered. I would bring in Barlach's surviving family. Her sister had married Dershowitz's brother Nathan and died, hit by a car as she rode a bike, some years after Sue, Then there will be the issues about why Dersh beat his wife. Was it systematic or was there a onetime grievance that was fairly limited in time? Did she throw out something important to him? Maybe his baseball card collection or porn magazines? If so, we go into details. Like what kind of porn or which baseball team? Had the sister said anything about the relationship between Sue and Dersh perhaps illuminating a motive for beating or even killing? Was Dersh trying to drive Sue insane? Dershowitz will not win this case. Given the glass house he has constructed with his life's energy. Dersh best shut up. and leave Schlossberg alone.
In my opinion if these executive orders continue to increase what will the next President order? That's the question
No! We did not elect the judiciary!
Carlin was a comedic genius and also a prophet.
Curious? What say you on potential issue of trump impoundment of congressionally appointed funds and Trump’s budgetary impositions?
Good lord! What a grumpy, self-absorbed frump. Why did I open this?
regardless, it will be colorful and make Trump look bad… that seems to be the entire objective regardless of time or cost
No they do not, for reasons Alan had described, lack of case & controversy.