How will DOMINION ever be brought into compliance with voting standards and oversight? Who has investigated DOMINION in overseas elections when governments have "changed hands?" or been overthrown following elections that DOMINION participated in.
After the 2020 election, I went online and found one copy of Dominion‘s operating manual for its most popular model. It states that votes are stored as a floating point number, not an integer. This was interpreted at the time as being proof that they could manipulate votes and was a significant source of the controversy. However, it can also be explained as a requirement to facilitate ranked choice voting. It would be nice to know the truth but without discovery we will never know.
Yes they did, because there own data collection for determining which states the candidate won would have been used against them, you can't claim like they did for Arizona when they called the winner against Trump based on the data they collected and then claim at the same time Dominion cheated when there equipment found he same results? How did you come to that conclusion and they couldn't?
Dersh’s 10 minute interview was shocking and important. I’m glad I listened to it.
How will DOMINION ever be brought into compliance with voting standards and oversight? Who has investigated DOMINION in overseas elections when governments have "changed hands?" or been overthrown following elections that DOMINION participated in.
Listened to your WABC interview this AM. Please follow up so that others may hear your legal opinion in detail. Thank you
After the 2020 election, I went online and found one copy of Dominion‘s operating manual for its most popular model. It states that votes are stored as a floating point number, not an integer. This was interpreted at the time as being proof that they could manipulate votes and was a significant source of the controversy. However, it can also be explained as a requirement to facilitate ranked choice voting. It would be nice to know the truth but without discovery we will never know.
Professor Dershowitz, I am asking you to respond to the WSJ editorial that claims that the settlement was good for journalism, as a loss for Fox would have been catastrophic for the press in the long run: https://www.wsj.com/articles/dominion-voting-fox-news-settlement-defamation-case-rupert-murdoch-john-poulos-bf605b16?mod=opinion_lead_pos1
Yes they did, because there own data collection for determining which states the candidate won would have been used against them, you can't claim like they did for Arizona when they called the winner against Trump based on the data they collected and then claim at the same time Dominion cheated when there equipment found he same results? How did you come to that conclusion and they couldn't?