Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EFR's avatar

I would argue that states, and the people living there, are perfectly capable of determining their abortion laws, including what drugs may or may not be permissible, without Washington apparatchiks interposing. Over the last one hundred years the United States has moved from a decentralized approach to governance, under the banner of a republic, to a top down, plutocratic, centralized state. Corruption is arguably worse than ever, poverty and crime are much worse, the war machine is in full swing, and we have fewer freedoms across the board.

I think what people really want is the opportunity to choose laws that reflect their values, not the values of the Washington establishment.

The irony is that the radical left preaches diversity, yet notice how difficult it is for the postmodernists to acccept diversity of thought. We are a very large republic, not the borg. Alabama and Texas do not need to be assimilated because the people living there don't subscribe to the views of those with 20M dollar vacation homes on Martha's vineyard.

Expand full comment
Andrew L Sullivan's avatar

Much of the problem is people are understanding abortion in the terms of decades long gone. The reality is we live in an age where people don't use any birth control, and have abortions based on the gender of the fetus, and vicious marketing of abortion where every abortion turns a profit.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts