100% in agreement with the horrible late night shows, just vile and mean spirited hatred, not funny or even amusing. I refused to watch them, not worth my time. Like you, I long for days of Benny, Berle, etc, comedy.
Interesting; issue is not whether or not call for Jewish genocide qualifies for 1st amendment protection, whether or not is is an "incitement to imminent violence" but rather whether or mor Harvard's code of conduct is applied equally; if calling for the genocide of LGQT students constitutes a violation of the code, if calling for the mass rape of women violates the code, why not too calling for the genocide of Jews??? Will they argue Jews are not a classically marginalized community🤡🤡🤡so that the threat of harm does not warrant school intervention?? How will they justify such skewed and particularized application of the conduct requirement??
I’d like to know the bases on which, say, Harvard has disciplined a professor for in class comments, for out of class comments, for out of class action—here I’m thinking of what happened to Ronald Sullivan when he acted for Harvey Weinstein, and on which any students, if any, have have been disciplined for in class or out of class speech of demonstrative political conduct. Then, couldn’t any of these bases apply to a professor or a student advocating genocide of Jews in class or out? And could the answer please take in the distinction between public or private universities? Does the hostile environment analysis enter into it? I’ll stop typing now and thank in advance anyone who can provide an authoritative answer.
100% in agreement with the horrible late night shows, just vile and mean spirited hatred, not funny or even amusing. I refused to watch them, not worth my time. Like you, I long for days of Benny, Berle, etc, comedy.
!!!! No !!!! Just as, one can not say fire while attending a movie theater .
Interesting; issue is not whether or not call for Jewish genocide qualifies for 1st amendment protection, whether or not is is an "incitement to imminent violence" but rather whether or mor Harvard's code of conduct is applied equally; if calling for the genocide of LGQT students constitutes a violation of the code, if calling for the mass rape of women violates the code, why not too calling for the genocide of Jews??? Will they argue Jews are not a classically marginalized community🤡🤡🤡so that the threat of harm does not warrant school intervention?? How will they justify such skewed and particularized application of the conduct requirement??
Please post on Twitter too.
Help Elon fight these cancel culture thugs. YouTube is owned by google, a company with a track record of censorship.
I’d like to know the bases on which, say, Harvard has disciplined a professor for in class comments, for out of class comments, for out of class action—here I’m thinking of what happened to Ronald Sullivan when he acted for Harvey Weinstein, and on which any students, if any, have have been disciplined for in class or out of class speech of demonstrative political conduct. Then, couldn’t any of these bases apply to a professor or a student advocating genocide of Jews in class or out? And could the answer please take in the distinction between public or private universities? Does the hostile environment analysis enter into it? I’ll stop typing now and thank in advance anyone who can provide an authoritative answer.
Holy shit that is a scary thought.
Nope.