It turns out that the disruption by several dozen Stanford University law school students of a speech to be given by federal judge Kyle Duncan was not a spontaneous exercise of freedom to protest. It was a well-planned and carefully orchestrated effort to prevent other Stanford students from hearing the judge's conservative views. The disruption was
Good information here, and Prof D hits all the nails on the head, but one thumbtack sticks out: did the ABA oppose the internment while it was in effect?
Good information here, and Prof D hits all the nails on the head, but one thumbtack sticks out: did the ABA oppose the internment while it was in effect?