Maybe he is, I don’t know. I believe in the presumption of innocence. I know sex/rape is one of the Deep State’s favorite wrap-up smears - the Steele Dossier, the Kavanaugh accusations, Assange, Ritter, etc. I also think that if he had something to hide, wouldn’t he be toeing the line instead of alienating himself by defending President Trump? The sad thing is it’s hard to imagine what a fair trial looks like anymore.
The Me Too Movement disgraced itself early on by preferencing accusation over proof. Since the horrors of October 7, 2023 Me Too has destroyed itself entirely by its silence in response to verifiable proof of grotesque sexual violence of the worst possible kind targeting women. The silence of movement feminists is deafening and shameful.
It's truly shameful that they aren't rallying to the fact that Jane Doe #3 has directly accused Alan Dershowitz of having sexual relations with multiple minors.
I enjoy your podcast Prof. Dershowitz and I believe you are a good, honest man. Thank you for your candor. I will be listening as often as I can. Prayers to you and the work you do for all of us! <3
I have pondered the rape of women, girls, and beheading of babies in Israel since October. It was more than violence. It was sending a message to all Israeli women and men about females’ value in a nation perhaps unlike their own to men, women, children to take the value of women from them. I recently read a NYTimes article confirming that the focus was on women and girls, and the act of reproduction that assigns a certain importance to women. It meant more than violence. It was sending a message to defile all of Israel. 🇮🇱
It means you should spend the rest of your satanic exitence on Earth in prison. Don't you worry. If you manage to avoid that, there's still a whole eternity left where you'll burn in hell.
That is not how legal advocacy works, or how it is supposed to work. Everyone is entitled to due procedure and a fair trial, even the very worst of people, and it is an attorney's duty to provide the best defense possible, even if he knows his client is guilty. That does not make a lawyer guilty by association with his client.
He was named by Jane Doe #3 has having sexual relations with multiple minors.
She claimed she witnessed it multiple times. This guy isn't guilty by association, he's guilty by his actions.
You are right though; lawyers cannot be held accountable for their clients actions while doing their job. Having sex with minors was not apart of his job though.
You mean Virginia Giuffre? She retracted that claim, making it clear that she had never met or even seen Alan Dershowitz. Is that why you failed to name her? So that people would think it was someone else? She had been pressured by her lawyers, just like crooked divorce lawyers pressure ex-wives to make similar baseless claims of sexual abuse and violence.
Defending an accused is is the cornerstone of our American jurisprudence, not a weak, but a vigorous defense. Otherwise innocent until proven guilty is meaningless. The goal of the Advocate is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused defense is required to be as strong and capable as the Accuser or the State.
No, I disagree, if he wasn't being named by Jane Doe #3 directly for his engagement there would be no other issue - A lawyer is hired to do a job, regardless of whether or not their client is guilty.
A lawyer has the right to accept or deny any client. I don’t care who you are. Child sex trafficking is an abomination. As an attorney he can walk away
I admire your courage, Professor D. It’s a hard situation and you are dealing with it in the best way possible. Godspeed.
He's dealing with being named by Jane Doe #3 for having sexual relations with multiple minors.
Don't call him courageous, he's a pedophile.
Maybe he is, I don’t know. I believe in the presumption of innocence. I know sex/rape is one of the Deep State’s favorite wrap-up smears - the Steele Dossier, the Kavanaugh accusations, Assange, Ritter, etc. I also think that if he had something to hide, wouldn’t he be toeing the line instead of alienating himself by defending President Trump? The sad thing is it’s hard to imagine what a fair trial looks like anymore.
The Me Too Movement disgraced itself early on by preferencing accusation over proof. Since the horrors of October 7, 2023 Me Too has destroyed itself entirely by its silence in response to verifiable proof of grotesque sexual violence of the worst possible kind targeting women. The silence of movement feminists is deafening and shameful.
It's truly shameful that they aren't rallying to the fact that Jane Doe #3 has directly accused Alan Dershowitz of having sexual relations with multiple minors.
I enjoy your podcast Prof. Dershowitz and I believe you are a good, honest man. Thank you for your candor. I will be listening as often as I can. Prayers to you and the work you do for all of us! <3
I have pondered the rape of women, girls, and beheading of babies in Israel since October. It was more than violence. It was sending a message to all Israeli women and men about females’ value in a nation perhaps unlike their own to men, women, children to take the value of women from them. I recently read a NYTimes article confirming that the focus was on women and girls, and the act of reproduction that assigns a certain importance to women. It meant more than violence. It was sending a message to defile all of Israel. 🇮🇱
The rape of women and girls and the beheaded babies never happened. It has been debunked as lies.
Except for the video evidence played by the attackers.
That was produced by the Zionist government and has already been debunked.
It means you should spend the rest of your satanic exitence on Earth in prison. Don't you worry. If you manage to avoid that, there's still a whole eternity left where you'll burn in hell.
VIRGINIA ROBERTS
You aren't just "guilty by association" multiple Jane Does have cited you DIRECTLY being involved.
Those who are guilty are the SQUEAKIEST WHEEL. GUILTY!
How can you defend GENOCIDE, ETHNIC CLEANSING, “FOCUS ON DAMAGE NOT ACCURACY”, “THEY ARE HUMAN ANIMALS”?
You have become a genocidal Zionist maniac DISGRACE.
I think you need to keep your insults confidential.
Why? Everybody has the freedom of speech.
If you were infact his lawyer then YOU ARE GUILTY ALSO. You most likely knew what he was doing. You need to be stripped of your license.
That is not how legal advocacy works, or how it is supposed to work. Everyone is entitled to due procedure and a fair trial, even the very worst of people, and it is an attorney's duty to provide the best defense possible, even if he knows his client is guilty. That does not make a lawyer guilty by association with his client.
He was named by Jane Doe #3 has having sexual relations with multiple minors.
She claimed she witnessed it multiple times. This guy isn't guilty by association, he's guilty by his actions.
You are right though; lawyers cannot be held accountable for their clients actions while doing their job. Having sex with minors was not apart of his job though.
You mean Virginia Giuffre? She retracted that claim, making it clear that she had never met or even seen Alan Dershowitz. Is that why you failed to name her? So that people would think it was someone else? She had been pressured by her lawyers, just like crooked divorce lawyers pressure ex-wives to make similar baseless claims of sexual abuse and violence.
Defending an accused is is the cornerstone of our American jurisprudence, not a weak, but a vigorous defense. Otherwise innocent until proven guilty is meaningless. The goal of the Advocate is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused defense is required to be as strong and capable as the Accuser or the State.
No, I disagree, if he wasn't being named by Jane Doe #3 directly for his engagement there would be no other issue - A lawyer is hired to do a job, regardless of whether or not their client is guilty.
Exactly, however the Defense needs to be equal to the Accused, or where is Justice?
A lawyer has the right to accept or deny any client. I don’t care who you are. Child sex trafficking is an abomination. As an attorney he can walk away