5 Comments

The fact that this decision would promote colorblindness was the basis of justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent: the person who couldn't define a woman...

Expand full comment

Here's my question for you, it took an ultra MAGA to sue to stop the Biden regime from directly censoring social media. Why? Where were the ACLU? Where were you? Where are the mass media? The mass media is crying that the government can no longer censor them. When I was young, you all sold me in Free Speech. But you all don't actually believe in free speech do you? You all are ok with government calling up social media and telling them what is permitted and what is not, who to kick off their platform. Explain why I shouldn't consider all you guys commie libs?

Expand full comment

Excellent job!

Thank you for putting your vacation on pause in order to address this important decision made by the Supreme Court Justices. This decision was long overdue. The noise on the left, when they don’t get their way, is to pack the courts. The scary thought is that this could actually happen.

Expand full comment

Great commentary - have a nice vacation !

Expand full comment

I'm very glad the Supreme Court did not cave to the pressure. It's a great ruling, but one wonders whether the radical administers at Harvard will actually follow it. There are ways to ascertain one's skin color, such as through a personal essay, one's last name, where they are applying from, etc, etc. But let's hope they move towards merit, because that's the way it should be.

Expand full comment