Did any post-civics class HS graduate learn anything from this podcast. Really superficial. Presentation of the Dershow opens the door to issues of Dershowitz's past, and his credibility.
Today is Day 2399 of the Dershowitz-Epstein cover-up. It is hoped that piercing of the cover-up will occur while Dersh lives, so we can hear his explanations about why he is not guilty,
why he has not produced alibi evidence,
why all the young teenagers knew him,
why they would be motivated to accuse him,
why he competed with Prince Andrew for the attention of the same, was she as old as 14, child,
why he was so engaged with Jeffrey Epstein and what was so attractive,
was it just platonic
what did he and Jeffrey generally talk about
why did he go on so many trips with Jeffrey
was it only Jeffrey connected directly to Mossad
was Ghislaine also Mossad, like her father
did she specifically recruit any girl at Dershowitz's request
how many underage children accused Dershowitz of pedophilic rape
does Dersh have any of the compromising films, or maybe of Clinton snd Gates
was it Dersh who told DA Acosta that the pedophilic rapes organization was an intelligence operation
why did Dersh insist on a secret immunity from the prosecutor, surely as a professor he knew it violated the Federal Victims Rights Act
has Dersh paid economic compensation to any of the women, raped as underage children.
did Dersh feel the ends of attaining better security for his favorite state justified the means of organized pedophilic rape
did the Acosta immunity agreement as well as subsequent defamation lawsuits against accusing children and their attorneys all function to start the cover up Dershowitz's participation in the pedophile organization?
in his own opinion, was Dershowitz, like Oswald, just the"patsy" for the pedo orgsnization?
And this is just the start. So many more issues. Tracing Dershowitz's involvement with Epstein is like tracing what Oswald was doing before Nov. 22, 1963. With the respective cover-ups still in place, their lifting is necessary to learn the truth and administer if possible deterrence. . Elon Musk has pressed Britain hard on dropping the cover-up of Pakistani pedophilic rape gangs in the their country. What about the Epstein pedos and co-conspirators? Kash Patel has promised release of the criminal investigation which ex-director Wry said was "ongoing still after 15 years.
hopefully can engage in the Dershowitz-Epstein cover-up.
Was Adams being targeted over something inconsequential because he wasn’t following the Biden playbook and is he being let off the hook because he is playing nice with Trump?
Thanx Alan!!! As usual, you are sooooo “right” with your responses to the Limousine Liberals-they just can’t look beyond their BS toward our “WE THE PEOPLE” president!! Keep up the good fight-there are LOTS of us behind you 😊😁
As for SNL, I haven't watched it in 40 years, and would certainly not waste 3 hours of my time to watch the Special. You are 100% correct, no longer funny or even interesting. Since I am in my mid 70s, I also agree with your point about comedy, the old comics were funniest..as Seinfeld often quoted in his show that prop comics are the lowest for of comedy, I agree with him there...smart observational comedy is the best, and funniest, more intellectual. I have taught HS drama and used the old Marx Brothers routine about the crooked lawyer (Groucho) talking over a contract with a client (Chico), with the long discussion ending with the groaner punchline. Chico says after the final Sanity Clause issue; "there's no such thing as Santa Claus". Kids could do this routine and found it funny. Of course I had to explain what Vaudeville was and why Groucho always wore loud stage make up in a movie. The rest of your show was great. I enjoyed it. Thank you.
The insanity purported by the No Longer Remotely Recognizable Dems prior to Oct 7 would have exceptional SNL material. The skits were writing themselves. But SNL hasn’t been remotely funny for years and the No Longer Dems are no longer comical. They’re deadly.
I used to dread attending our synagogue. On and on, recitation by rote with the added soporific of repeating the requisite redundancy- English- Hebrew. Every single passage. And the chanting without a single voice able to carry a note or remain in sync. Most dreaded were the sermons. The rabbi was the most boring, uninspiring nebbish , only out nebbished by whoever volunteered to carry the Torah down the aisle and back to the ark.
Until he became an Obama acolyte and activist. That’s when he became an as*h#le. A zealotous lecturer. First it was a paean to the Gay Boy Scouts, replete with finger-wagging and accusations of homophobic bigotry. Ironic, being 90% of the congregation had long gotten past issues with sexuality, but it was the rabbi who had issues. This became a thing. Racism, this-ism, Republicans were every “ ism”, Obama was the Savior. Thing is, though the congregation was largely liberal leaning Democrat , Obama was driving them away. Myself included. Also, a house of worship should never inject politics into what should be an escape from divisiveness , but one of peace and unity.. The last straw was hosting CAIR as his guests during his sermon.Lecturing the congregants on the Palestinian “ plight”. It followed a terrorist attack in Tel Aviv. Going on about “ Islamophobia” following the Pulse Nightclub Massacre, claiming the Islamist terrorist was neither motivated by Islam or homophobia. Instead, he was a disturbed young man having marital problems.
My husband and I looked at each other and without exchanging a word, left. I’d had it and decided to call the rabbi. He had plenty of time to call every week to squeeze mor money out of us, the week prior , another $5000 for whatever the grift of the month. Otherwise, the weekly squeeze ranged from $100-$250, plus the $10, 000 annual commitment, events, sisterhood, brotherhood membership fees, donations of artwork, sculptures, furniture pieces from my design showroom for fundraising auctions.. and “ guest speakers” from CAIR, Now!, etc. But when I expressed my opposition, he said, “ I don’t have time for this!” And hung up. But I had time to cancel the $5000 check, our membership and spare myself from wasting those precious hours bored to death and then infuriated in that supposed house of worship.
Trump just declared himself above the law—and he's proving it. From gutting the DOJ to stacking the courts, his power grab is happening in real time. This article I wrote breaks down how democracy is unraveling—and what must be done to stop it.
If all the people have all the rights then how do some of the people have some of the right some of the time. Or something like that silly question from a person who known matter what testimony is given over 20 testified state of fla wrong I still have nothing after 8 yrs of wrongful conviction and 2 people a disable person with autism and elder mom have no rights. We will see happens feb 24 alachua county count 21ga 1439 andrew bromberg ga
And we have the right to judge those who choose to resign over objections to which exercises of power they deem abusive and which they don't. Like I judge the prosecutors who said this was their line in the sand, but weren't so offended by the abuses heaped on to Pres. Trump, his advisors and J6'ers exercising their free speech.
She/they certainly have the right to do what they are doing. I strongly support her right to do so. I also know she's thoroughly corrupt and supports prosecuting political opposition, criminalizing the exercise of free speech, opposes equal protections under the law and conspires to deprive Americans of their constitutional rights. That's what her resignation communicates about her, her values. That I exercise my right to judge her (lack of) character and (lack of) morals on. She ain't know hero outside of her own despicable mind.
Did any post-civics class HS graduate learn anything from this podcast. Really superficial. Presentation of the Dershow opens the door to issues of Dershowitz's past, and his credibility.
Today is Day 2399 of the Dershowitz-Epstein cover-up. It is hoped that piercing of the cover-up will occur while Dersh lives, so we can hear his explanations about why he is not guilty,
why he has not produced alibi evidence,
why all the young teenagers knew him,
why they would be motivated to accuse him,
why he competed with Prince Andrew for the attention of the same, was she as old as 14, child,
why he was so engaged with Jeffrey Epstein and what was so attractive,
was it just platonic
what did he and Jeffrey generally talk about
why did he go on so many trips with Jeffrey
was it only Jeffrey connected directly to Mossad
was Ghislaine also Mossad, like her father
did she specifically recruit any girl at Dershowitz's request
how many underage children accused Dershowitz of pedophilic rape
does Dersh have any of the compromising films, or maybe of Clinton snd Gates
was it Dersh who told DA Acosta that the pedophilic rapes organization was an intelligence operation
why did Dersh insist on a secret immunity from the prosecutor, surely as a professor he knew it violated the Federal Victims Rights Act
has Dersh paid economic compensation to any of the women, raped as underage children.
did Dersh feel the ends of attaining better security for his favorite state justified the means of organized pedophilic rape
did the Acosta immunity agreement as well as subsequent defamation lawsuits against accusing children and their attorneys all function to start the cover up Dershowitz's participation in the pedophile organization?
in his own opinion, was Dershowitz, like Oswald, just the"patsy" for the pedo orgsnization?
And this is just the start. So many more issues. Tracing Dershowitz's involvement with Epstein is like tracing what Oswald was doing before Nov. 22, 1963. With the respective cover-ups still in place, their lifting is necessary to learn the truth and administer if possible deterrence. . Elon Musk has pressed Britain hard on dropping the cover-up of Pakistani pedophilic rape gangs in the their country. What about the Epstein pedos and co-conspirators? Kash Patel has promised release of the criminal investigation which ex-director Wry said was "ongoing still after 15 years.
hopefully can engage in the Dershowitz-Epstein cover-up.
The question is if it is ethical.
Was Adams being targeted over something inconsequential because he wasn’t following the Biden playbook and is he being let off the hook because he is playing nice with Trump?
Thanx Alan!!! As usual, you are sooooo “right” with your responses to the Limousine Liberals-they just can’t look beyond their BS toward our “WE THE PEOPLE” president!! Keep up the good fight-there are LOTS of us behind you 😊😁
As for SNL, I haven't watched it in 40 years, and would certainly not waste 3 hours of my time to watch the Special. You are 100% correct, no longer funny or even interesting. Since I am in my mid 70s, I also agree with your point about comedy, the old comics were funniest..as Seinfeld often quoted in his show that prop comics are the lowest for of comedy, I agree with him there...smart observational comedy is the best, and funniest, more intellectual. I have taught HS drama and used the old Marx Brothers routine about the crooked lawyer (Groucho) talking over a contract with a client (Chico), with the long discussion ending with the groaner punchline. Chico says after the final Sanity Clause issue; "there's no such thing as Santa Claus". Kids could do this routine and found it funny. Of course I had to explain what Vaudeville was and why Groucho always wore loud stage make up in a movie. The rest of your show was great. I enjoyed it. Thank you.
I really hate the crap that gets printed because of proofreading. Mayer? READ your post before you send it!
I’ll watch when you’re on X
The insanity purported by the No Longer Remotely Recognizable Dems prior to Oct 7 would have exceptional SNL material. The skits were writing themselves. But SNL hasn’t been remotely funny for years and the No Longer Dems are no longer comical. They’re deadly.
I used to dread attending our synagogue. On and on, recitation by rote with the added soporific of repeating the requisite redundancy- English- Hebrew. Every single passage. And the chanting without a single voice able to carry a note or remain in sync. Most dreaded were the sermons. The rabbi was the most boring, uninspiring nebbish , only out nebbished by whoever volunteered to carry the Torah down the aisle and back to the ark.
Until he became an Obama acolyte and activist. That’s when he became an as*h#le. A zealotous lecturer. First it was a paean to the Gay Boy Scouts, replete with finger-wagging and accusations of homophobic bigotry. Ironic, being 90% of the congregation had long gotten past issues with sexuality, but it was the rabbi who had issues. This became a thing. Racism, this-ism, Republicans were every “ ism”, Obama was the Savior. Thing is, though the congregation was largely liberal leaning Democrat , Obama was driving them away. Myself included. Also, a house of worship should never inject politics into what should be an escape from divisiveness , but one of peace and unity.. The last straw was hosting CAIR as his guests during his sermon.Lecturing the congregants on the Palestinian “ plight”. It followed a terrorist attack in Tel Aviv. Going on about “ Islamophobia” following the Pulse Nightclub Massacre, claiming the Islamist terrorist was neither motivated by Islam or homophobia. Instead, he was a disturbed young man having marital problems.
My husband and I looked at each other and without exchanging a word, left. I’d had it and decided to call the rabbi. He had plenty of time to call every week to squeeze mor money out of us, the week prior , another $5000 for whatever the grift of the month. Otherwise, the weekly squeeze ranged from $100-$250, plus the $10, 000 annual commitment, events, sisterhood, brotherhood membership fees, donations of artwork, sculptures, furniture pieces from my design showroom for fundraising auctions.. and “ guest speakers” from CAIR, Now!, etc. But when I expressed my opposition, he said, “ I don’t have time for this!” And hung up. But I had time to cancel the $5000 check, our membership and spare myself from wasting those precious hours bored to death and then infuriated in that supposed house of worship.
Trump has the right to do so in good faith based on the case alone.
He doesn't have the right to do it as bribery or extortion
Dropping the case to get Eric Adams to cooperate on illegal aliens is a Crime.
I think the old story is right thank you appreciate your excellent analysis
Trump just declared himself above the law—and he's proving it. From gutting the DOJ to stacking the courts, his power grab is happening in real time. This article I wrote breaks down how democracy is unraveling—and what must be done to stop it.
would love to hear your thoughts
https://open.substack.com/pub/jasonegenberg/p/the-rule-of-law-vs-the-rule-of-trump?r=3nm35j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
If all the people have all the rights then how do some of the people have some of the right some of the time. Or something like that silly question from a person who known matter what testimony is given over 20 testified state of fla wrong I still have nothing after 8 yrs of wrongful conviction and 2 people a disable person with autism and elder mom have no rights. We will see happens feb 24 alachua county count 21ga 1439 andrew bromberg ga
And we have the right to judge those who choose to resign over objections to which exercises of power they deem abusive and which they don't. Like I judge the prosecutors who said this was their line in the sand, but weren't so offended by the abuses heaped on to Pres. Trump, his advisors and J6'ers exercising their free speech.
She/they certainly have the right to do what they are doing. I strongly support her right to do so. I also know she's thoroughly corrupt and supports prosecuting political opposition, criminalizing the exercise of free speech, opposes equal protections under the law and conspires to deprive Americans of their constitutional rights. That's what her resignation communicates about her, her values. That I exercise my right to judge her (lack of) character and (lack of) morals on. She ain't know hero outside of her own despicable mind.