Federal, State Officials Aiding Criminal Misconduct, Corruption, Injustice and Sexual Abuse "Under Color of Law"
Eighty traffic stops in four years. Five robberies. Home invasion and death threats by armed Sheriff Deputies with AR-15s and shotguns pointed at my head and at my dog "Boomer's" head while two young children were mere feet away on a second floor. False arrest. False imprisonment.
Actionable evidence including recordings, documents, hundreds of witnesses contact information with no conflicts of interest esp. regarding crimes against children involving rape and abuse.
Only EXTERNAL demands might drive long-overdue official accountability, investigation, oversight, an end to abuses, brutality, crimes of a community & local, State & Federal corruption that would shock most Americans. It sounds unbelievable, but is very much real in Wilmington N.C.
Though provided irrefutable almost certainly admissible evidence of criminal activities involving:
U.S. Department of Justice & F.B.I. involvement in extensive criminal misconduct by Corrupt North Carolina officials including sexual abuses of children, theft of Federal funds, lynching's, retaliatory murders, torture, violence & retribution against child victims, families & the few who have dared discuss horrific abuses suffered & retaliation by officials, prosecutors & bribed media.
This "Culture of Corruption," once pursued, is now Assisted, Protected by the U.S. DOJ, FBI USAO despite vast evidence & growing #s of victims of violent criminal acts that any remotely moral person would conclude:
CONGRESS MUST HOLD THESE FEDERAL OFFICIALS AND THE STATE AND LOCAL SADISTIC CRIMINALS OFFICIALLY PROTECTED TO ACCOUNT.
NO OFFICIAL WHO ENGAGES IN SUCH EVIL SHOULD EVER BE MAINTAINED OR SUPPORTED IN OR ALLOWED TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE OR PRACTICE LAW EVER.
Gag orders should only be imposed against witnesses and prosecuting attorneys. Everyone else involved in a trial has a right to freely defend themselves, even if they do it in public.
Your second sentence is not the Law. Criminal defendants are treated differently than witnesses. A safeguard is that a witness may be cross-examined in court about any of these public statements. A defendant with interests in the outcome may have the power to be a threat to presentation of evidence., by intimidation or thru interpretation of credibility. The eventual disparity in power and motivation to apply it as well as consequences of eventual use justify different treatment. Example: imagine an old man, a celebrity lawyer with a big TV reputation and access to lots of money and influence. Imagine one or more underage girls characterized by him as "lunatics" and "prostitutes" claiming he raped them. His epithets are adequate basis for a gag order applied to the celebrity since they reasonably may affect the presentation of evidence and may sway judge/jury at least unconsciously. The girls, lacking his power and influence should as a starting point not be subjected to a gag order, since they are not defendants, do not have the celebrity's power and influence and should have a right to contradict the epithets. Defendant's cross-examination right is sufficient protection ,
Alan Dershowitz is one of those old-fashioned ethnocentric men, whose ideological identity is defined by their ethnicity.. He is a civil libertarian in America, which is no threat to, and is rather extremely rewarding for his ethnic identification. But being a civil libertarian in Tel Aviv threastens existentially the structure of the entire apartheid Ashkenazi regime. . On Cambridge issues, Alan is a civil libertarian. In Tel Aviv, Alan is a racist.
https://justice4all.substack.com/p/federal-state-officials-aiding-criminal-662
Federal, State Officials Aiding Criminal Misconduct, Corruption, Injustice and Sexual Abuse "Under Color of Law"
Eighty traffic stops in four years. Five robberies. Home invasion and death threats by armed Sheriff Deputies with AR-15s and shotguns pointed at my head and at my dog "Boomer's" head while two young children were mere feet away on a second floor. False arrest. False imprisonment.
Actionable evidence including recordings, documents, hundreds of witnesses contact information with no conflicts of interest esp. regarding crimes against children involving rape and abuse.
Only EXTERNAL demands might drive long-overdue official accountability, investigation, oversight, an end to abuses, brutality, crimes of a community & local, State & Federal corruption that would shock most Americans. It sounds unbelievable, but is very much real in Wilmington N.C.
Though provided irrefutable almost certainly admissible evidence of criminal activities involving:
U.S. Department of Justice & F.B.I. involvement in extensive criminal misconduct by Corrupt North Carolina officials including sexual abuses of children, theft of Federal funds, lynching's, retaliatory murders, torture, violence & retribution against child victims, families & the few who have dared discuss horrific abuses suffered & retaliation by officials, prosecutors & bribed media.
This "Culture of Corruption," once pursued, is now Assisted, Protected by the U.S. DOJ, FBI USAO despite vast evidence & growing #s of victims of violent criminal acts that any remotely moral person would conclude:
CONGRESS MUST HOLD THESE FEDERAL OFFICIALS AND THE STATE AND LOCAL SADISTIC CRIMINALS OFFICIALLY PROTECTED TO ACCOUNT.
NO OFFICIAL WHO ENGAGES IN SUCH EVIL SHOULD EVER BE MAINTAINED OR SUPPORTED IN OR ALLOWED TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE OR PRACTICE LAW EVER.
https://justice4all.substack.com/p/federal-state-officials-aiding-criminal-662
Gag orders should only be imposed against witnesses and prosecuting attorneys. Everyone else involved in a trial has a right to freely defend themselves, even if they do it in public.
Your second sentence is not the Law. Criminal defendants are treated differently than witnesses. A safeguard is that a witness may be cross-examined in court about any of these public statements. A defendant with interests in the outcome may have the power to be a threat to presentation of evidence., by intimidation or thru interpretation of credibility. The eventual disparity in power and motivation to apply it as well as consequences of eventual use justify different treatment. Example: imagine an old man, a celebrity lawyer with a big TV reputation and access to lots of money and influence. Imagine one or more underage girls characterized by him as "lunatics" and "prostitutes" claiming he raped them. His epithets are adequate basis for a gag order applied to the celebrity since they reasonably may affect the presentation of evidence and may sway judge/jury at least unconsciously. The girls, lacking his power and influence should as a starting point not be subjected to a gag order, since they are not defendants, do not have the celebrity's power and influence and should have a right to contradict the epithets. Defendant's cross-examination right is sufficient protection ,
Okay, it probably isn't the law. It was my opinion; I guess I should have made that clear.
I agree 100% with your discussion. Gag order is ridiculous and unfair. Obvious conflict of interest.
Alan Dershowitz is one of those old-fashioned ethnocentric men, whose ideological identity is defined by their ethnicity.. He is a civil libertarian in America, which is no threat to, and is rather extremely rewarding for his ethnic identification. But being a civil libertarian in Tel Aviv threastens existentially the structure of the entire apartheid Ashkenazi regime. . On Cambridge issues, Alan is a civil libertarian. In Tel Aviv, Alan is a racist.