Mamdani was actually on a mainstream news station ( can’t remember which) being interviewed and he said he believes in Israel’s right to exist. I believe he is lying to win voters. His past statements are all anti Semitic.
This means he wants it annihilated. He did make a comment using the phrase “ from the river to the sea” meaning the same thing in one of his statements.
They all lie. That is part of their religion and culture! Thank you for posting your opinion. And this is what we get as a response from our little babies here in the US.
He refused to denounce his “globalize the intifada” cry but gave interview to Hasidic newspaper and told the Orthodox Jews that he would protect them LOL. What an opportunist and timeserver. He simply cannot wait to get into the Gracie Mansion by all means possible.
Also, Alan Dershowitz, whose podcast I responded to, says he will never vote for Mamdani. I don’t know how many Jewish Harvard (or other Ivy League) scholars live in NY, but Alan’s departure from the Democrat party in recent years speaks volumes. The Socialists ( Democrats) have always gotten, and still always get, the Jewish vote. Yet, the Democrats really do not support most Jewish values. It’s hard to figure out why Jewish people still support them. Has anyone written on this topic?
the great part about self-funding is you get to tell powerful people things they don’t want you to say. money ALWAYS has implicit or even express “strings attached”. Ok, donny the mafia crybaby isn’t happy his kidsies didn’t get harveys. So?
This is like a speedbump in the onward march of progress and i generally don’t point out all that free RICO legal scholarship I produced because Machiavelli correctly teaches we should fight with laws but must be able to fight with claws and the world’s been real clawsy since 2014…
Been watching the Diddy trial which is somewhat similar to the trial Dersh would have had were he not protected by Mossad and -Jewish billionaires (and now AG Pam Bondi) . Besides both defendants being generally repugnant men, the issues seem similar, involving coercion. Consent is being argued by -Diddy. That argument is much less available to Dershowitz since his sexual preference at age 73 according to multiple accusations was for underage almost barely pubescent kids.
Coercion seems a red flag issue when a geriatric in poor physical condistion with grey skin pallor and eczema (Sara Ransomme's deposition, she kept her eyes open) pushes sexual contact with a very young teenager.. Consent is of course irrelevant when the raped child was underage. This is the basis for statutory rape law, apparently Dersh's "bete noir". His POV may be Socratic, that young semiclothed kids and similarly clad geriatrics belong together. Relevant to issues of consent, when applicable, are violence (hmm, he's done that, think of the fate of Sue Barlach and the divorce court judge's findings) intimidation (Dersh's constant MO) and threats of repercussion (ditto). Any or all of these would chip away at any claim of consent from a child not underage.
It does not take very long for Dersch to tell the story of the Harvard club and the New York Times book review and his new book. Basically three or four nights a week he comes on to push the book and give a little commentary on stuff we already know. I still listen to him, but he is boring
He is boring because, like with Ghislaine Maxwell there are so many Omerta restrictions on what he can talk about. He goes on Megyn Kelly with a precondition contract, oral or written on the acceptable topics for discussion. Nothing ever freewheeling. Little girls' bodies are always forbidden topics despite Kelly's interest in protecting little girls. . Stat rape is a forbidden topic even though Dersh constantly inveighs against these "much too high" ages of consent. So Dersh is boring because he wants to be. Were he less boring, maybe Mossad would off Dersh, Epstein-style, .as a loose cannon. Frankly absent an indictment of Dersh for pedophilic rapes and child trafficking, I wish Derahowitz were far less boring. I think I would enjoy Mossad's reaction.
Mamdani was actually on a mainstream news station ( can’t remember which) being interviewed and he said he believes in Israel’s right to exist. I believe he is lying to win voters. His past statements are all anti Semitic.
Hitler said he believed in peace, Stalin promised abundance. Mamdoni says he believes Israel has right to exist... unarmed and tiny.
This means he wants it annihilated. He did make a comment using the phrase “ from the river to the sea” meaning the same thing in one of his statements.
They all lie. That is part of their religion and culture! Thank you for posting your opinion. And this is what we get as a response from our little babies here in the US.
https://hiddentruthsbysunny.substack.com/p/the-real-reason-road-blocking-activists
He refused to denounce his “globalize the intifada” cry but gave interview to Hasidic newspaper and told the Orthodox Jews that he would protect them LOL. What an opportunist and timeserver. He simply cannot wait to get into the Gracie Mansion by all means possible.
Also, Alan Dershowitz, whose podcast I responded to, says he will never vote for Mamdani. I don’t know how many Jewish Harvard (or other Ivy League) scholars live in NY, but Alan’s departure from the Democrat party in recent years speaks volumes. The Socialists ( Democrats) have always gotten, and still always get, the Jewish vote. Yet, the Democrats really do not support most Jewish values. It’s hard to figure out why Jewish people still support them. Has anyone written on this topic?
Mamdani isn’t mayor yet!! This might be his swan song!
Some days it seems they are all lying to us!
You might enjoy my thoughts on this subject.
Thank you,
Sunny
I followed the link and read the post. Hats off to you and to all lovers of our Constitutional republic!
You say that larry "has to" put up with the leftist crazies. No he doesnt.
the great part about self-funding is you get to tell powerful people things they don’t want you to say. money ALWAYS has implicit or even express “strings attached”. Ok, donny the mafia crybaby isn’t happy his kidsies didn’t get harveys. So?
This is like a speedbump in the onward march of progress and i generally don’t point out all that free RICO legal scholarship I produced because Machiavelli correctly teaches we should fight with laws but must be able to fight with claws and the world’s been real clawsy since 2014…
Been watching the Diddy trial which is somewhat similar to the trial Dersh would have had were he not protected by Mossad and -Jewish billionaires (and now AG Pam Bondi) . Besides both defendants being generally repugnant men, the issues seem similar, involving coercion. Consent is being argued by -Diddy. That argument is much less available to Dershowitz since his sexual preference at age 73 according to multiple accusations was for underage almost barely pubescent kids.
Coercion seems a red flag issue when a geriatric in poor physical condistion with grey skin pallor and eczema (Sara Ransomme's deposition, she kept her eyes open) pushes sexual contact with a very young teenager.. Consent is of course irrelevant when the raped child was underage. This is the basis for statutory rape law, apparently Dersh's "bete noir". His POV may be Socratic, that young semiclothed kids and similarly clad geriatrics belong together. Relevant to issues of consent, when applicable, are violence (hmm, he's done that, think of the fate of Sue Barlach and the divorce court judge's findings) intimidation (Dersh's constant MO) and threats of repercussion (ditto). Any or all of these would chip away at any claim of consent from a child not underage.
It does not take very long for Dersch to tell the story of the Harvard club and the New York Times book review and his new book. Basically three or four nights a week he comes on to push the book and give a little commentary on stuff we already know. I still listen to him, but he is boring
He is boring because, like with Ghislaine Maxwell there are so many Omerta restrictions on what he can talk about. He goes on Megyn Kelly with a precondition contract, oral or written on the acceptable topics for discussion. Nothing ever freewheeling. Little girls' bodies are always forbidden topics despite Kelly's interest in protecting little girls. . Stat rape is a forbidden topic even though Dersh constantly inveighs against these "much too high" ages of consent. So Dersh is boring because he wants to be. Were he less boring, maybe Mossad would off Dersh, Epstein-style, .as a loose cannon. Frankly absent an indictment of Dersh for pedophilic rapes and child trafficking, I wish Derahowitz were far less boring. I think I would enjoy Mossad's reaction.