Because Mr Dershowitz the media in this country pride themselves on being on the wrong end of every single thing. Why would they change now? They didn’t even report on the horrific slaughter of Jewish innocent civilian children and families instead they cried and moaned over the Israeli soldiers hunting down the terrorists who murdered them. They don’t report on the victims of the criminal illegal aliens just how unjust Trump is in deporting them. Completely backwards
Trump did a very smart thing which he learned from his first term and privately funded his transition. Funding it privately he didn’t give anyone the opportunity to sabotage his agenda and made it possible to get a running start on Day One.
It makes sense that no one in the US illegally, nor their children should be subject to the jurisdiction of the Constitution. Common Sense People! And the sensible distinction between people who have lived in the US 20 years and contributed somehow is just that: requiring sensible distinction from the other illegal aliens.
You look a little rough around the edges there Dersh...you sure the medical emergency was no big deal? Take care of yourself.
As you correctly point out, the main question about the 14th is the phrase: "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Some people would claim that an illegal immigrant, a foreigner who is here illegally under the law, is still subject to his or her home country, therefore not eligible. Of course there are many countries who have an unrestricted birthright law, most in the Americas. Like I previously said, Trump is tossing it out there for legal scholars to debate and SCOTUS to define, and most likely to force Congress to define some kind of restrictions. Most countries have various types of restrictions. I agree with your discussion. Great show, entertaining as always. Keep it up.
For a restrictive immigration policy to work, mostly for the purposes of disincentivizing people from making the trek to the border and crossing over, there must be a Loud, global statement that there is a ‘new sheriff’ and unrestricted entry will no longer be tolerated.
To do so, there must be a clear and consistent message that all avenues for making one’s way in and staying shall be cut off. There can’t be a message stating ‘except for…..’. !
Moreover, the message must be that after The federal govt has tracked down, arrested, prosecuted, and subsequently deported criminal element along with court ordered deportation and expired visas that all others shouldn’t get comfortable. The message must be harsh as a disincentive.
Any looming loophole will be seen as ‘hope’ of staying or to still enter illegally and maybe there won’t be any complications.
Question: an issue related to mass migration, not just unvetted and in unchecked mass
Migration, is that of a census counting those deemed as illegals, on visas, etc.
Why is this something that should occur? When counting for a census in representation distribution for congress, why should illegals be counted ? Moreover, is it constitutionally proper to do so? And, why should this remain?
It's all been so fast people are confused, and they are giving mixed messages. A turn against Trump's new policies is rising especially in the media!
I want some time to decompress personally. I would GREATLY love to see a meeting with Putin. And what about Canada unloading so much military war 'items' to Ukraine now?! I assumed it's timing is anti Trump or just a dumping before the war ends? Phew.... and I am a Trumper.
Unfortunately this podcast seems limited to draw very heavily on well-known content from the New York Times analyses.
Discussions about immigration relate to how different ethnic groups can cooperate in one nation. More specifically since Mr Dershowitz is an Orthodox Jew, how will he and people with his core values will treat immigrants, and how these core religious/ethnic values differ from modern American values. There is an obvious problem with presumptions on Ashkenazi Supremacy., comprehensively and frequently confirmed in Hebrew literature and being the basis for the Jewish Supremacy Law of 2018.
As Peter Beinert writes, there is a great need for Judaism to reform away from this ethnic supremacy value towards making human equality a core value. The issue of Equality motivated the secession of Christianity from Judaism since the Christians insisted that Gentile converts were and must be be treated as the equals of Jews. Many Jewish writers, not Dershowitz or Ben Shapiro of course, emphasize the need for example for Jews to learn to treat Palestinians as equals, and that Jews can learn human equality without becoming Christian..
No idea on intent? There is nothing written by ‘the founding fathers’ to give an idea on the 14th amendment Clause related to citizenship? Anti-federalist papers? Any writings by Jefferson, Madison, etc?
Trump is ushering in a new era of masculine competence and meritocracy.
I agree with you on this.
History in the making!
Because Mr Dershowitz the media in this country pride themselves on being on the wrong end of every single thing. Why would they change now? They didn’t even report on the horrific slaughter of Jewish innocent civilian children and families instead they cried and moaned over the Israeli soldiers hunting down the terrorists who murdered them. They don’t report on the victims of the criminal illegal aliens just how unjust Trump is in deporting them. Completely backwards
Trump did a very smart thing which he learned from his first term and privately funded his transition. Funding it privately he didn’t give anyone the opportunity to sabotage his agenda and made it possible to get a running start on Day One.
Thank you for your work. I find your show to be informative and educational.
It makes sense that no one in the US illegally, nor their children should be subject to the jurisdiction of the Constitution. Common Sense People! And the sensible distinction between people who have lived in the US 20 years and contributed somehow is just that: requiring sensible distinction from the other illegal aliens.
Brilliant! Thank you.
I just learned 4 to be released were deceased in a short blurb on TV Monday today
You look a little rough around the edges there Dersh...you sure the medical emergency was no big deal? Take care of yourself.
As you correctly point out, the main question about the 14th is the phrase: "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Some people would claim that an illegal immigrant, a foreigner who is here illegally under the law, is still subject to his or her home country, therefore not eligible. Of course there are many countries who have an unrestricted birthright law, most in the Americas. Like I previously said, Trump is tossing it out there for legal scholars to debate and SCOTUS to define, and most likely to force Congress to define some kind of restrictions. Most countries have various types of restrictions. I agree with your discussion. Great show, entertaining as always. Keep it up.
Entertainers are what lawyers become when legal acumen dries up.
Consider incentives:
For a restrictive immigration policy to work, mostly for the purposes of disincentivizing people from making the trek to the border and crossing over, there must be a Loud, global statement that there is a ‘new sheriff’ and unrestricted entry will no longer be tolerated.
To do so, there must be a clear and consistent message that all avenues for making one’s way in and staying shall be cut off. There can’t be a message stating ‘except for…..’. !
Moreover, the message must be that after The federal govt has tracked down, arrested, prosecuted, and subsequently deported criminal element along with court ordered deportation and expired visas that all others shouldn’t get comfortable. The message must be harsh as a disincentive.
Any looming loophole will be seen as ‘hope’ of staying or to still enter illegally and maybe there won’t be any complications.
Question: an issue related to mass migration, not just unvetted and in unchecked mass
Migration, is that of a census counting those deemed as illegals, on visas, etc.
Why is this something that should occur? When counting for a census in representation distribution for congress, why should illegals be counted ? Moreover, is it constitutionally proper to do so? And, why should this remain?
It's all been so fast people are confused, and they are giving mixed messages. A turn against Trump's new policies is rising especially in the media!
I want some time to decompress personally. I would GREATLY love to see a meeting with Putin. And what about Canada unloading so much military war 'items' to Ukraine now?! I assumed it's timing is anti Trump or just a dumping before the war ends? Phew.... and I am a Trumper.
Unfortunately this podcast seems limited to draw very heavily on well-known content from the New York Times analyses.
Discussions about immigration relate to how different ethnic groups can cooperate in one nation. More specifically since Mr Dershowitz is an Orthodox Jew, how will he and people with his core values will treat immigrants, and how these core religious/ethnic values differ from modern American values. There is an obvious problem with presumptions on Ashkenazi Supremacy., comprehensively and frequently confirmed in Hebrew literature and being the basis for the Jewish Supremacy Law of 2018.
As Peter Beinert writes, there is a great need for Judaism to reform away from this ethnic supremacy value towards making human equality a core value. The issue of Equality motivated the secession of Christianity from Judaism since the Christians insisted that Gentile converts were and must be be treated as the equals of Jews. Many Jewish writers, not Dershowitz or Ben Shapiro of course, emphasize the need for example for Jews to learn to treat Palestinians as equals, and that Jews can learn human equality without becoming Christian..
No idea on intent? There is nothing written by ‘the founding fathers’ to give an idea on the 14th amendment Clause related to citizenship? Anti-federalist papers? Any writings by Jefferson, Madison, etc?