Regardless of one’s political views, party membership, or personal assessment of Mr. Trump’s character, any reasonably informed thinking mind must conclude that the orchestrated, collectively coordinated by the White House, and appallingly spurious prosecutions of Mr. Trump are particularly harrowing ¬— they indicate a blatant, post-cons…
Regardless of one’s political views, party membership, or personal assessment of Mr. Trump’s character, any reasonably informed thinking mind must conclude that the orchestrated, collectively coordinated by the White House, and appallingly spurious prosecutions of Mr. Trump are particularly harrowing ¬— they indicate a blatant, post-constitutional, oligarchical government that will not hesitate to resort to wildly arbitrary abuses of prosecutorial discretion and power to stifle dissent and maintain political power.
Consider: Matthew Colangelo, who holds a law degree from Harvard University, is a former senior DOJ official and paid DNC consultant and advisor, is Alvin Bragg’s lead prosecutor in the “Stormy Daniels” case. He prosecutes Mr. Trump for “election interference” in the 2016 federal election notwithstanding that federal courts have exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over federal election law cases. State courts simply lack the judicial power to adjudicate such cases, and the U.S. Attorney’s office has declined to prosecute Mr. Trump for “election interference.” Either Mr. Colangelo escaped taking courses in federal jurisdiction, criminal procedure and legal ethics while attending Harvard Law, or he’s committed to prosecuting “political justice” of the Lavrentiy Beria strain.
Next, consider Jack Smith, who also holds a law degree from Harvard University. Smith has served as a prosecutor in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office and the U.S. Attorney’s offices for the Eastern District of New York and as the acting attorney general for the Middle District of Tennessee. Yet, despite his education and experience, he either skipped classes addressing or has chosen to ignore fundamental principles of substantive and procedural due process and equal protection constraints on prosecutorial discretion imposed by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and his ethical obligations to the judicial system and criminal descendants, including his duties of candor to a tribunal and defendants, and his due process obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
Next, consider Merrick Garland, who also received his law degree from Harvard University. He has served as Chief Justice of the D.C. Court of Appeals and once was nominated for an Associated Justice position on the U.S. Supreme Court. Yet, despite his formal education and vast experience, he apparently has not declined to assist the White House and DNC “election interference” demands to vigorously pursue specious coordinated prosecutions in multiple jurisdictions for purposes of bankrupting Mr. Trump, preventing him from campaigning, and obtaining at least one “conviction” of something, however false and meritless, to deter electors who otherwise might vote for him, knowing that a reversal on appeal is a certainty, but only after Mr. Trump is forced to incur millions in legal expenses and not before 11/05/2024. Also, Mr. Garland has not declined to assist the White House in its baldly inexcusable refusals to enforce federal immigration law.
There is much more, with the unsealing of discovery documents in Florida. These learned men may be producing discovery of their own to the Trump team. That will be determined in one of the pretrial hearings before August.
Regardless of one’s political views, party membership, or personal assessment of Mr. Trump’s character, any reasonably informed thinking mind must conclude that the orchestrated, collectively coordinated by the White House, and appallingly spurious prosecutions of Mr. Trump are particularly harrowing ¬— they indicate a blatant, post-constitutional, oligarchical government that will not hesitate to resort to wildly arbitrary abuses of prosecutorial discretion and power to stifle dissent and maintain political power.
Consider: Matthew Colangelo, who holds a law degree from Harvard University, is a former senior DOJ official and paid DNC consultant and advisor, is Alvin Bragg’s lead prosecutor in the “Stormy Daniels” case. He prosecutes Mr. Trump for “election interference” in the 2016 federal election notwithstanding that federal courts have exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over federal election law cases. State courts simply lack the judicial power to adjudicate such cases, and the U.S. Attorney’s office has declined to prosecute Mr. Trump for “election interference.” Either Mr. Colangelo escaped taking courses in federal jurisdiction, criminal procedure and legal ethics while attending Harvard Law, or he’s committed to prosecuting “political justice” of the Lavrentiy Beria strain.
Next, consider Jack Smith, who also holds a law degree from Harvard University. Smith has served as a prosecutor in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office and the U.S. Attorney’s offices for the Eastern District of New York and as the acting attorney general for the Middle District of Tennessee. Yet, despite his education and experience, he either skipped classes addressing or has chosen to ignore fundamental principles of substantive and procedural due process and equal protection constraints on prosecutorial discretion imposed by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and his ethical obligations to the judicial system and criminal descendants, including his duties of candor to a tribunal and defendants, and his due process obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
Next, consider Merrick Garland, who also received his law degree from Harvard University. He has served as Chief Justice of the D.C. Court of Appeals and once was nominated for an Associated Justice position on the U.S. Supreme Court. Yet, despite his formal education and vast experience, he apparently has not declined to assist the White House and DNC “election interference” demands to vigorously pursue specious coordinated prosecutions in multiple jurisdictions for purposes of bankrupting Mr. Trump, preventing him from campaigning, and obtaining at least one “conviction” of something, however false and meritless, to deter electors who otherwise might vote for him, knowing that a reversal on appeal is a certainty, but only after Mr. Trump is forced to incur millions in legal expenses and not before 11/05/2024. Also, Mr. Garland has not declined to assist the White House in its baldly inexcusable refusals to enforce federal immigration law.
There’s more, much more. But this should suffice.
There is much more, with the unsealing of discovery documents in Florida. These learned men may be producing discovery of their own to the Trump team. That will be determined in one of the pretrial hearings before August.