There's a problem with your logic when it comes to the Classified Document question. 1) Biden actually gave a classified doc to his ghost writer who read it as he used for the Biden book. This hard documented proof. 2) Trump waved a random piece of paper in the air claiming it was a classified document, but there is no evidence or proof that anybody read it or even saw it, it could have been a menu as far as anybody could possibly know. You can argue that both had a classified document, and that is a crime, but there is only hard evidence of Biden who actually had classified documents. In Trump's case, we only have his word...and he could have been joking or using his usual macho bravado talk. It is not proof, it is speculation, no one saw it or read it, no photos, nothing. Never mind the issue with Biden having boxes illegal retained classified documents for years as a Senator and Vice-President who stored them haphazardly in multiple unsecured locations, while Trump's documents were all declassified, stored in one secured location, while he had the power to declassify as president, except for one possible exception with no hard proof of that particular fact. That's your problem, no actual proof that Trump had a classified document, it's all based on hearsay: reasonable doubt.
When those who are responsible to up hold the law and then turn around and break the law and make laws as they go along , means that we no longer have laws in the United States (the law of the land) . Now is just the will to survive and that's where we are in the USA . Our own congress can not control the White House and most have been bought and corrupted . The United States has been shredded to a point of a destructive free fall . In the words of Newt Gingridge , " The only one. that can save these United States is Trump. If Trump looses, then say good by to the land we've loved and grew up in. " To those who have read this post ; I hope you take this message to heart . This not politics , this is the cold hard truth.
Pretty obviously double standards flourish in American law enforcement. One is clearly prosecuting Trump. Another, a particular leitmotif of mine, is the non-prosecution of Mr Dershowitz and Epstein co-conspirators, all secretly immunized from prosecution following Mr Dershowitz's success at "reasoning" wiith DA Alex Acosta. Dershowitz won the non-prosecution deals by using Epstein influence on a very career- motivated federal prosecutor, by emphasizing that that career would be hurt if Epstein's money and influential friends were mobilized against Acosta, and according to Acosta, Dershowitz claimed that the Epstein underage child rapes were part of an allied intelligence agency operation, so Acosta simply had to lay off. So no one other than Ghislaine has been prosecuted.
Further evidence gathering in the case was stopped by 1) sealing the FBI/Palm Beach Police Dept criminal investigation which covered Dershowitz's activities at least in enabling and protecting Epstein from law enforcement and assessing issues of complicity and 2) Dershowitz's reflexive defamation lawsuits against every whistleblowing girl and her attorney. As to double standards, Dershowitz is clearly part of the reason double standards are so usual in criminal law. Double standards are of course highly corrupting for a society supposively based upon equal justice. It is doubtful one can talk about there being equal justice in America. It seems no more than a constitutional ideal which has never had a chance to come to fruition. Money, influence and big liesd determine so much of justice i the USA. The beneficiaries of double standards tend to find reinforcement in the lack of prosecution and continue on with impunity in their criminal/anti-social ways, like for example propagandizing for IDF genocide and lying about commission of IDF atrocities. BTW instead of thinking of Dershowitz as a suspected pedophile, let's be generous in light of the non-prosecution and just say the 85 y.o. is "young at heart".
There's a problem with your logic when it comes to the Classified Document question. 1) Biden actually gave a classified doc to his ghost writer who read it as he used for the Biden book. This hard documented proof. 2) Trump waved a random piece of paper in the air claiming it was a classified document, but there is no evidence or proof that anybody read it or even saw it, it could have been a menu as far as anybody could possibly know. You can argue that both had a classified document, and that is a crime, but there is only hard evidence of Biden who actually had classified documents. In Trump's case, we only have his word...and he could have been joking or using his usual macho bravado talk. It is not proof, it is speculation, no one saw it or read it, no photos, nothing. Never mind the issue with Biden having boxes illegal retained classified documents for years as a Senator and Vice-President who stored them haphazardly in multiple unsecured locations, while Trump's documents were all declassified, stored in one secured location, while he had the power to declassify as president, except for one possible exception with no hard proof of that particular fact. That's your problem, no actual proof that Trump had a classified document, it's all based on hearsay: reasonable doubt.
I wish I could like this more than once.
Absolutely, and they don’t even try to disguise it!
When those who are responsible to up hold the law and then turn around and break the law and make laws as they go along , means that we no longer have laws in the United States (the law of the land) . Now is just the will to survive and that's where we are in the USA . Our own congress can not control the White House and most have been bought and corrupted . The United States has been shredded to a point of a destructive free fall . In the words of Newt Gingridge , " The only one. that can save these United States is Trump. If Trump looses, then say good by to the land we've loved and grew up in. " To those who have read this post ; I hope you take this message to heart . This not politics , this is the cold hard truth.
Pretty obviously double standards flourish in American law enforcement. One is clearly prosecuting Trump. Another, a particular leitmotif of mine, is the non-prosecution of Mr Dershowitz and Epstein co-conspirators, all secretly immunized from prosecution following Mr Dershowitz's success at "reasoning" wiith DA Alex Acosta. Dershowitz won the non-prosecution deals by using Epstein influence on a very career- motivated federal prosecutor, by emphasizing that that career would be hurt if Epstein's money and influential friends were mobilized against Acosta, and according to Acosta, Dershowitz claimed that the Epstein underage child rapes were part of an allied intelligence agency operation, so Acosta simply had to lay off. So no one other than Ghislaine has been prosecuted.
Further evidence gathering in the case was stopped by 1) sealing the FBI/Palm Beach Police Dept criminal investigation which covered Dershowitz's activities at least in enabling and protecting Epstein from law enforcement and assessing issues of complicity and 2) Dershowitz's reflexive defamation lawsuits against every whistleblowing girl and her attorney. As to double standards, Dershowitz is clearly part of the reason double standards are so usual in criminal law. Double standards are of course highly corrupting for a society supposively based upon equal justice. It is doubtful one can talk about there being equal justice in America. It seems no more than a constitutional ideal which has never had a chance to come to fruition. Money, influence and big liesd determine so much of justice i the USA. The beneficiaries of double standards tend to find reinforcement in the lack of prosecution and continue on with impunity in their criminal/anti-social ways, like for example propagandizing for IDF genocide and lying about commission of IDF atrocities. BTW instead of thinking of Dershowitz as a suspected pedophile, let's be generous in light of the non-prosecution and just say the 85 y.o. is "young at heart".
Duh! Of course there is….
I believe that the lynching you are referring to happened in 2000, not 2020.
Alan,
Is there a double standard for which civil liberties righteous lawyers choose to protect? Here is my work being attacked by HaSatan.
https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/patents-implicate-pandemic-conspiracy
Liable Party RICO Actors:
https://covidandvaxfaqs.substack.com/p/incriminating-patents-uAlam,
Fear not:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=joshua+1%3A9%2C+proverbs+29%3A25%2C+isaiah+41%3A10+%2C+haggai+2%3A6-7%2C+2+timothy+1%3A7&version=CJB
Love and Shalom 🕊
Geoff Wexler
𝘋𝘦𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘮𝘺 16:18, 𝘔𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘸 5:10
Is the Pope Catholic?
No, he's a Marxist.