Roe ranks with Dred Scott and Lochner as a decision that reeks of judicial legislation at its worst as noted by such constitutional scholars as Alexander Bickel John Hart Ely and Robert Bork and even by Lawrence Tribe
Wow Professor. I quote “… overruling Roe would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. ” does that speak to the events of January 6 as well? “ … (upholding a questionable result ) would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. “ or can you “distinguish” as a legal scholar? Or “distinguish” on the basis of partisan argument; an advocate as it were?
Roe ranks with Dred Scott and Lochner as a decision that reeks of judicial legislation at its worst as noted by such constitutional scholars as Alexander Bickel John Hart Ely and Robert Bork and even by Lawrence Tribe
Wow Professor. I quote “… overruling Roe would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. ” does that speak to the events of January 6 as well? “ … (upholding a questionable result ) would be an unmitigated disaster, and that an act of civil disobedience was warranted. “ or can you “distinguish” as a legal scholar? Or “distinguish” on the basis of partisan argument; an advocate as it were?